Sentences with phrase «comparative negligence standard»

In states with a comparative negligence standard, responsibility for an accident is allocated according to the degree of fault of the people involved in the accident.

Alternatively, under a comparative negligence standard, the court will evaluate the facts of the case and determine how much fault both the plaintiff and defendant are for the plaintiff's injury.

In American law, personal injury statutes are generally either based on a contributory negligence or a comparative negligence standard.

A comparative negligence standard will reduce insurance costs and promote additional public and private capital investments.

Assembly Majority Leader Joe Morelle has proposed legislation that would amend the law «by applying comparative negligence standards to a recalcitrant worker.»

Not exact matches

The first thing to understand is that car accidents are considered a type of personal injury, meaning that your case will be subject to the standard of modified comparative negligence.

In fact, thanks to the standard of modified comparative negligence, which allows liability to be split among multiple parties in an accident, insurers have all the motivation in the world to keep you in the dark.

To determine liability in personal injury cases, Idaho uses a standard called modified comparative negligence, which only allows injury victims to recover damages if they're found to hold less than half of the responsibility for their harm.

This is because California adheres to a «comparative negligence» standard.

Other states have «comparative negligence» standards that may permit recovery when both drivers are at fault, but that is not the case in Virginia.

To understand how fault works in commercial trucking wrecks in Washington state, it's critical to understand the basics of the standard of comparative negligence.

This standard is very different from the standard applied in many other states, which use a standard referred to as comparative negligence.