You might think this is a relatively easy proposition to evaluate — just
compare whether charter school kids do better on tests than those in public schools.
Not exact matches
Instead of asking
whether all students in
charter schools are more likely to attend segregated schools than are all students in traditional public schools, we should be
comparing the racial composition of
charter schools to that of nearby traditional public schools.
Unlike a badly designed
charter school study recently released by Mathematica, which
compared students who changed schools with those who did not, MDRC studied only students who moved to a new school regardless of
whether they attended a small one or went elsewhere.
Ritter continues, «Instead of asking
whether all students in
charter schools are more likely to attend segregated schools than are all students in traditional public schools, we should be
comparing the levels of segregation for the students in
charter schools to what they would have experienced had they remained in their residentially assigned public schools.»
As the evidence on school choice continues to grow, it is tempting to
compare the results achieved by school voucher programs to those of
charter schools — to ask
whether one option or the other represents a more promising avenue for expanding educational opportunity.
Simply
comparing performance based on
whether a student's district school is or is not located within one mile of a
charter school could be misleading given differences in where
charter schools are located.
Abdulkadiroglu et al. (2011) and Angrist, Pathak, and Walters (2013) found similar estimates of the impact of a year in a Boston area
charter school
whether they
compared charter school admission lottery winners and losers or
whether they
compared charter attendees to regular public school students with similar observed characteristics.
So, our project looked at how well all of the schools in a city —
whether they are district - or
charter - governed — are serving their city's children and how a city's schools
compare to those in other cities.
When voters were asked
whether charter schools should be located in certain areas of the state, such as those in failing school districts, or throughout the entire state, 57 percent said the entire state
compared to 18 percent who said just in certain areas and 17 percent who said they....
When voters were asked
whether charter schools should be located in certain areas of the state, such as those in failing school districts (as the law currently allows), or throughout the entire state, 57 percent said the entire state
compared to 18 percent who said just in certain areas and 17 percent who said they should not be available anywhere.
When voters were asked
whether charter schools should be located in certain areas of the state, such as those in failing school districts, or throughout the entire state, 57 percent said the entire state
compared to 18 percent who said just in certain areas and 17 percent who said they should not be available anywhere.
In this post, Burris looks at
whether charter schools can properly be
compared with district public schools — as they often are.
The full data set is more than just
comparing whether magnets or
charter schools are «better.»
The studies come amid a growing debate over the question of
whether charter schools are inadequately funded
compared with traditional public schools, and if / how they improve student achievement better than the traditional schools.
The study
compared charters in Louisiana, the majority of which are in New Orleans, to Louisiana public schools, controlling for factors like race, ethnicity, poverty and
whether students qualified for special education.
If
comparing all
charter schools to all district schools is «like asking
whether eating out is better than eating at home,» 71 then concentrating resources into the propagation of nonunionized, segregated
charter schools is like going to a buffet and only eating the dinner rolls.
As Kelley notes in his legal review,
charter operators often argue that all that matters is
whether charter school students do well on standardized tests and that parents are generally satisfied with the schools» performance
compared to public schools.
In the 2016 - 17 school year,
charter schools receive substantially less per pupil regardless of
whether it operates in public or private space; the IBO estimates that
charters are underfunded
compared to traditional district schools by $ 1,145 to $ 4,863 per pupil.
One may already stop here to wonder
whether the EFTA Court is not making its life too easy speaking of an interpretation of EEA law «in the light» of fundamental rights in the present case; a more thorough reasoning would have had to grapple with the scope of EEA law in the case: Only if Iceland was acting effectively within the scope of EEA law here the fundamental rights standards of EEA law apply under the EFTA Court's supervision; otherwise one could argue that the Supreme Court of Iceland's action ought to be judged against the benchmark of domestic fundamental rights and ECHR standards (
compare the rich debate on the parallel problem in EU law which focuses on Article 51 of the EU
Charter of Fundamental Rights).
The Legal Battle Over The World's Oldest Profession
Compared to Kyle Freeman, Terri - Jean Bedford faces no threshold questions about
whether the
Charter applies to her case.