Sentences with phrase «compares average student performance»

The answer to that puzzle is actually quite simple and has little to do with the fact that Phillips compares average student performance while our study focuses on advanced students: many OECD countries, including those that had a high percentage of high - achieving students, participated in PISA 2006 (upon which our analysis is based) but did not participate in either TIMSS 2003 or TIMSS 2007, the two surveys included in the Phillips studies.

Not exact matches

The researchers compared these mental states with each student's performance, including grades for assignments and their grade - point average for the term.

Proficiency rates on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) among charter students are not only consistently higher than those of students in their respective district sectors, but many of these rates compare favorably to the states with the highest average levels of performance.

The GRC compares academic achievement in math and reading across all grades of student performance on state tests with average achievement in a set of 25 other countries with developed economies that might be considered economic peers of the U.S..

Peggy Carr, acting commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), drily noted that, compared to the international average, «we also have a higher percentage of students who score in the lowest performance levels... and a lower percentage of top math performers.»

In addition, the LAUSD average 59 percent four - year graduation rate was found to range widely by individual high school and by ethnicity, even when comparing students of similar eighth - grade English performance.

The statistics give you lots of options for curriculum connections: You might have students compare the rushing yards of players on two opposing teams or find averages of a player's performance over several games.

In the report Blake noted there was no evidence that small schools were disadvantaged in terms of educational performance, however, he pointed out that Tasmanian public primary schools were more costly per student compared to the Australian average and the Tasmanian Government could save potentially $ 433,000 per year for each school closed.

Standardized test scores allow parents to compare the performance of their own child and the average performance of their child's school against the performance of students in the same grade in other schools around the state and nationwide.

This was the picture from two reports issued by Gary Phillips of the American Institutes for Research, who compared the average performance in math of 8th - grade students in each of the 50 states with the average scores of 8th - grade students in other countries.

«We should question the relevance of comparing so - called U.S. national student performance with average scores in other countries, when U.S. students attend schools in 51 separate education systems run by states and the District of Columbia, not the federal government,» said Carnoy.

It focuses on the relevance of comparing U.S. national student performance with average scores in other countries when U.S. students attend schools in 51 separate education systems run not by the federal government, but by states (plus the District of Columbia).

Local tests would eventually be modified to include questions that would allow the public to gauge how average student performance compares to international standards.

Track behavior and academic performance over time to see students grow throughout the year, identify problems before they escalate, and compare to the class average.

Figure 2 compares PL students» average performance with that of their grade - level peers across the country.

The automated data reports in FAST ™ also provide visuals to help teachers understand how their students» performance compares to average grade - level students in the country, within the district, within the school, and within the student's general education classroom.

But why compare national student performance in the United States with average scores in other countries, when U.S. students attend schools in 51 separate education systems responsible to states and the District of Columbia, not the federal government?

To evaluate the academic performance of students in LAUSD Alliance charter schools compared to LAUSD traditional high schools located in the same neighborhoods with similar student demographics, we focus on four variables, each school's rate of attendance, their API (Academic Performance Index) score, the average SAT score per school, and the graduation rate performance of students in LAUSD Alliance charter schools compared to LAUSD traditional high schools located in the same neighborhoods with similar student demographics, we focus on four variables, each school's rate of attendance, their API (Academic Performance Index) score, the average SAT score per school, and the graduation rate Performance Index) score, the average SAT score per school, and the graduation rate per school.

This allows us to understand how well the school is educating disadvantaged student groups compared to the state average for those students, and how those students are performing compared to non-disadvantaged students this school, factoring in both the achievement level and the performance gaps.

Compare student performance across academic and non-academic measures; then, compare it to school and district avCompare student performance across academic and non-academic measures; then, compare it to school and district avcompare it to school and district averages.

In other cases where overall performance is at least average, several states with narrower - than - average achievement gaps serve student populations that are less diverse compared to the make - up of the student population nationally.

State, district, and school average results are included in relevant sections of the report to help parents understand how their student's performance compares to that of other students.

Three analyses were conducted with the cross-sectional data using teachers» WSS ratings of student achievement and students» WJ - R standard scores: a) correlations comparing the students» standard scores on the various subtests of the WJ - R and the WSS checklist and summary report ratings of student achievement within the corresponding WSS domains, b) four - step hierarchical regressions examining the different factors that accounted for the variance in students» spring WJ - R scores, and c) Receiver - Operating - Characteristic (ROC) curves, which make possible a determination of whether a random pair of average and below - average scores on the WJ - R would be ranked correctly in terms of performance on the WSS.