The rate of increase (i.e. change in temperature per year) is increasing, so maybe the best way to tell is by
comparing decadal changes.
Not exact matches
Here is graph of the AMO
compared to the geomagnetic field of Ob - Yenisei estuaries area http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/SibArc.htm Elsewhere it was shown that the AMO also closely follows combined oscillations of the sunspot magnetic cycle and the
decadal changes in the Earth's magnetic field.
The platform will complement existing GMES / Copernicus pre-operational components, but will focus on datasets which provide information on climate variability on
decadal to centennial time scales from observed and projected climate
change impacts in Europe, and will provide a toolbox to generate,
compare and rank key indicators.
It is hardly likely that such a high level of TSI
compared to historical levels is going to have no effect at all on global temperature
changes and indeed during most of that period there was an enhanced period of positive Pacific
Decadal Oscillation that imparted increasing warmth to the atmosphere.
«stratospheric water vapor probably increased between 1980 and 2000, which would have enhanced the
decadal rate of surface warming during the 1990s by about 30 % as
compared to estimates neglecting this
change.
It is hardly likely that such a high level of TSI
compared to historical levels is going to have no effect at all on global temperature
changes and indeed during most of that period there was also an enhanced period of positive Pacific
Decadal Oscillation that imparted increasing warmth from the oceans to the atmosphere.
The study includes an estimate of the effect of the observed stratospheric water
decadal decrease by calculating the radiation flux with and without the
change, and
comparing this to the increase in CO2 forcing over the same period.