9/12/2007 UC San Diego Medical Center Performs Southwest's First «Natural Orifice» Surgery With Removal of Gallbladder through the Vagina Clinical Trial
Compares Laparoscopic vs. Natural Orifice Techniques Surgeons at the University of California, San Diego Medical Center have performed the first clinical trial surgery in the Southwest to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of perfo... More...
Not exact matches
Two studies published by JAMA
compare certain outcomes of robotic - assisted vs
laparoscopic surgery for kidney removal or rectal cancer.
Ahuja's study confirmed that for colon surgery, when
compared to open surgery,
laparoscopic surgery is associated with a lower mortality rate, a lower complication rate, shorter hospital stays and lower costs.
In one study, In Gab Jeong, M.D., Ph.D., of the Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, and University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, and colleagues examined the use of robotic - assisted radical nephrectomy (kidney removal) in the United States and
compared the in - hospital outcomes and costs between this procedure and
laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.
The researchers found that there were no statistically significant differences in the rates of conversion to open laparotomy for robotic - assisted
laparoscopic surgery
compared with conventional
laparoscopic surgery (8.1 percent vs 12.2 percent, respectively), and there were no statistically significant differences in complication rates or quality of life at six months.
In this study, to our knowledge the largest randomized clinical trial of robotic - assisted
laparoscopic surgery for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma suitable for curative resection, there were no statistically significant differences in the rates of conversion to open laparotomy for robotic - assisted
laparoscopic surgery
compared with conventional
laparoscopic surgery (8.1 % vs 12.2 %, respectively), and there were no statistically significant differences in CRM +, complication rates, or quality of life at 6 months.
There is insufficient evidence to conclude that robotic - assisted
laparoscopic surgery,
compared with conventional
laparoscopic surgery, reduces the risk of conversion to open laparotomy when performed by surgeons of varying experience with robotic - assisted surgery.
•
Laparoscopic spays result in 65 percent less pain
compared to traditional open spays.
Laparoscopic (Minimally Invasive) Surgery Both you and your pet benefit from minimally invasive surgery as there is much less pain, less anesthesia time, fewer potential complications and minimal recovery period as
compared to traditional abdominal surgery.