Not exact matches
The «
subsidies» that wind power has received to date are miniscule
compared to the historic and ongoing
subsidies to nuclear power — and to the
fossil fuel industry,
for that matter.
My own research shows that, even taking the OECD's analysis at face value, when we
compare the «
subsidies» given to green and brown sectors on a unit -
for - unit basis, the renewable sector enjoys thirteen times the
subsidy that the
fossil fuel sector received.
As a means of comparison, in 2011 alone the International Energy Agency estimated that global
fossil fuel direct
subsidies were worth $ 523 billion,
compared to $ 88 billion
for renewables.
But that remains a fantasy as long as renewable energy continues to be economically disadvantaged in favor of
fossil fuel: In 2013, according to the International Institute
for Sustainable Development, consumer
subsidies to
fossil fuels totaled $ 548 billion,
compared to only $ 121 billion
for renewables.
Compared to existing New Jersey state
subsidies for solar at fifty times this amount per megawatt - hour, the proposed help
for nuclear plants would provide outstanding environmental protection value while paying
for itself through lower
fossil fuel bills and retained in - state jobs and tax revenue.