Not exact matches
The seventh,
comparing classrooms
within schools that did and did not have an MCL, showed no statistically significant impact, because reading improved in both types of classrooms after multi-classroom leaders began leading some of the
teachers in each
school.
However, the studies did not offer much description on the nature of the leadership provided by
teacher leaders in team settings and how the role of
teacher leaders may vary
within teams of
teachers compared to their role on
school leadership teams.
As described in an earlier brief, some research provides evidence that value - added measures — at least those that
compare teachers within the same
school and adjust well for students» prior achievement — do not favor
teachers who teach certain types of students.
Second,
teachers and
schools should be aware of age differences when
comparing children
within classes — a simple technique is to put a class register in order of birth.
The automated data reports in FAST ™ also provide visuals to help
teachers understand how their students» performance
compares to average grade - level students in the country,
within the district,
within the
school, and
within the student's general education classroom.
Teachers of color make up 27.6 percent of the charter
school teaching population,
compared with 16 percent
within district
schools.51 For example, Uncommon Schools — a charter school network in Boston, New Jersey, and New York — runs a competitive summer teaching fellowship that targets students of color in their junior year of college.52 Fifty - two fellowship alumni now teach in Uncommon classr
schools.51 For example, Uncommon
Schools — a charter school network in Boston, New Jersey, and New York — runs a competitive summer teaching fellowship that targets students of color in their junior year of college.52 Fifty - two fellowship alumni now teach in Uncommon classr
Schools — a charter
school network in Boston, New Jersey, and New York — runs a competitive summer teaching fellowship that targets students of color in their junior year of college.52 Fifty - two fellowship alumni now teach in Uncommon classrooms.53
Each panel
compares the rating of
teachers using a value - added model with prior test scores and student covariates to placements from another model: (1) a value - added model that includes only a prior test score (Panels A and D); (2) the SGP model (Panels B and E); and (3) a value - added model that makes
within -
school comparisons (Panels C and F).
These models, which consider student growth on standardized tests, fall roughly into four categories: «value - added models» that do not control for student background; models that do control for student background; models that
compare teachers within rather than across
schools; and student growth percentile (SGP) models, which measure the achievement of individual students
compared to other students with similar test score histories.
They also differ by whether they
compare teachers across a district (or state) or just
within schools.
If these are convergent, we can assume that the decision to
compare teachers working in different
schools (
within the same subset of
schools) has not contributed bias to the value - added scores.
However, the research supporting this finding is based on studies in which
teachers were randomly assigned to students
within the same
school, mainly
within elementary
schools, while most value - added systems
compare teachers in different
schools.