Independent evaluators have found that schools embracing EL Education programs significantly advance students» reading and math abilities in
comparison to other schools.
Not exact matches
We noted that no
other major institution in American society» notably the public
school system, social workers, Boy Scouts, athletic associations» has been subjected
to similar scrutiny, and that some experts believe that the incidence of sex abuse by priests and bishops is relatively small by
comparison.
Each year public
school children are subjected
to standardized tests
to measure their achievements in
comparison to all
other public -
schooled kids.
In the piece, I address why America's
school meals so often pale in
comparison to those in
other countries, and the many obstacles faced by our
school districts which make scratch - cooked, healthier meals a real challenge.
The
comparison was
to observe how
school lunch worked in
other countries, France in particular, which has a well - known and respected
school lunch program.
Recognizing the educational challenges represented by children in poverty, who are not fluent in English or have
other special needs, the Bloomberg administration — even as it relentlessly encouraged the growth of charter
schools — built a citywide methodology designed
to look past simple
comparisons of average
school scores on state tests.
Schools were matched and paired for analysis, with one
school teaching the curriculum and the
other school not teaching it,
to serve as a control group for
comparison.
Our methodological approach allows for an «apples -
to - apples»
comparison and allows us
to disentangle the effects of
school spending from that of all these
other countervailing forces.
The most appropriate
comparison tool might be a sort of similar -
schools index that compares each
school to other schools with similar demographics (the state used
to have this).
And while the state does have a tool that allows for some
comparisons within
school districts, it is clunky and cumbersome compared
to information systems in
other states and districts available today.
These data are a useful starting point, but may be confounded by
comparisons to statewide averages instead of
to the
other schools in these students» neighborhoods as well as the differences in program participation discussed earlier.
... But we also would like
to take the research further, beyond UNE researchers,
to see [if]
other researchers across Australia or maybe even the world would like
to do a bit of
comparison of the use of disappearing media in
schools Australia - wide, New Zealand, or beyond.
As the recent comparative studies have shown, these results pale in
comparison to Boston's high - performing charter sector but are stronger than those in most
other urban public
school systems.
Supporters and critics, in their various approaches
to discerning NCLB's impact, share a significant problem: because NCLB applies
to all public
school students, researchers lack a suitable
comparison group and so have been unable
to distinguish the law's effects from the myriad
other factors at work over the past eight years.
As CFE v. New York shows, the easiest way
to gauge «essential resources» is by
comparison with
other school districts.
This depends on how
schools assign students
to such programs, in particular, whether a child's eligibility is based on a
comparison to other children in his grade or
to other children his age.
In
other words, citizens appear
to be evaluating
schools based on local
comparisons or on information provided by their state testing system without taking into account the relative rigor of state standards.
It is even more difficult
to make
comparisons within the private sector, which comprises Catholic
schools, religious
schools sponsored by
other faiths, and secular
schools.
According
to the report, TIMSS 2015: A first look at Australia's results, released by the Australian Council for Educational Research, average achievement levels in secondary
schools continue
to slide in
comparison with performances in many
other countries.
• In - depth view on what the industries really want from graduates • The support of each education tiers — Early, primary, seconday and higher learning in shaping holistic graduates • Asessing the quality and cost of Malaysia's education in
comparison to other ASEAN countries • Gaining insights on new teaching methods — Outdoor learning and trust
schools • Transforming education system
to cater new generation
Restricting the
comparisons to students attending the same
school ensures that any effects we observe reflect the impact of troubled students and not the fact that
schools with more such students differ in unobserved ways from
other schools.
These sites all offer users the ability
to compare their
school with
others in the same
school district or state (because standard tests in each state vary, it's difficult
to make such
comparisons across districts in different states), and a few rank
schools based on test performance or
other factors.
Whereas the
schools identified for closure experienced an increase of 6.5 percentage points relative
to their projected graduation rate, the
other low - performing
comparison schools experienced an increase of 1.4 percentage points.
The upshot: Even as they write «college and career readiness» rates into their ESSA plans, many states have no reliable way
to determine how many of their high
school seniors are reaching that point and, regardless of what they use for standards and tests, practically none will be able
to make valid
comparisons with
other states.
The second article offers a more direct
comparison of charters
to other public
schools, using a random lottery design.
Yes, America's
schools are often outscored by
other nations on international exams, but
to what extent do those
comparisons measure
schools and
to what extent are they reflections of cultural attitudes over which
schools have little control?
It is early
to make
comparisons, not even 50 free
school inspection reports have been published
to date, however, when compared
to all
schools inspected during the same period, under the new, more rigorous Ofsted framework, free
schools are performing well: 73 per cent have been judged as «outstanding» or «good», compared with 63 per cent of
other schools.
Our database also includes a «
comparison clipboard» that allows users
to easily click on a
school or district and paste it onto an online clipboard, then add more
schools or districts
to see how they stack up next
to each
other.
To argue that she has been even moderately successful with her approach, we would have to ignore the legitimate concerns of local and national charter reformers who know the city well, and ignore the possibility that Detroit charters are taking advantage of loose oversight by cherry - picking students, and ignore the very low test score growth in Detroit compared with other cities on the urban NAEP, and ignore the policy alternatives that seem to work better (for example, closing low - performing charter schools), and ignore the very low scores to which Detroit charters are being compared, and ignore the negative effects of virtual schools, and ignore the negative effects of the only statewide voucher programs that provide the best comparisons with DeVos's national agend
To argue that she has been even moderately successful with her approach, we would have
to ignore the legitimate concerns of local and national charter reformers who know the city well, and ignore the possibility that Detroit charters are taking advantage of loose oversight by cherry - picking students, and ignore the very low test score growth in Detroit compared with other cities on the urban NAEP, and ignore the policy alternatives that seem to work better (for example, closing low - performing charter schools), and ignore the very low scores to which Detroit charters are being compared, and ignore the negative effects of virtual schools, and ignore the negative effects of the only statewide voucher programs that provide the best comparisons with DeVos's national agend
to ignore the legitimate concerns of local and national charter reformers who know the city well, and ignore the possibility that Detroit charters are taking advantage of loose oversight by cherry - picking students, and ignore the very low test score growth in Detroit compared with
other cities on the urban NAEP, and ignore the policy alternatives that seem
to work better (for example, closing low - performing charter schools), and ignore the very low scores to which Detroit charters are being compared, and ignore the negative effects of virtual schools, and ignore the negative effects of the only statewide voucher programs that provide the best comparisons with DeVos's national agend
to work better (for example, closing low - performing charter
schools), and ignore the very low scores
to which Detroit charters are being compared, and ignore the negative effects of virtual schools, and ignore the negative effects of the only statewide voucher programs that provide the best comparisons with DeVos's national agend
to which Detroit charters are being compared, and ignore the negative effects of virtual
schools, and ignore the negative effects of the only statewide voucher programs that provide the best
comparisons with DeVos's national agenda.
Instead of funding a national network of 10 regional education labs, suppose those funds were made available on a competitive basis
to individual state agencies willing
to help districts track the impacts of their own efforts,
to identify matched
comparison groups for their initiatives (using
other students and
schools in a state) and
to generate reports on impacts.
In a briefing paper prepared for the National Academy of Education (NAE) and the American Educational Research Association, Linda Darling - Hammond and three
other distinguished authors reached the following conclusion: «With respect
to value - added measures of student achievement tied
to individual teachers, current research suggests that high - stakes, individual - level decisions, as well as
comparisons across highly dissimilar
schools or student populations should be avoided.»
Ed - Data
comparisons enable users
to view test results for multiple
schools or districts, along with
other data, in one place.
To understand what nonsense this is, see the comparison of Ravenswood to other schools with comparable percentages of low - income and ELL students in Andy Rotherham's blog post..
To understand what nonsense this is, see the
comparison of Ravenswood
to other schools with comparable percentages of low - income and ELL students in Andy Rotherham's blog post..
to other schools with comparable percentages of low - income and ELL students in Andy Rotherham's blog post....
All of this is meant
to say that using blunt
comparisons of test results does not prove that charter
schools or public
schools are any better or worse than each
other in terms of academic performance, or any
other characteristic.
She also claimed that Ofsted's focus on
schools may be due
to the larger amount of control government has over them in
comparison to other early years providers — including powers over place supply.
No matter what label is stuck on University Technology Colleges and Studio
Schools — there are far too few of them
to make a meaningful
comparison with
other types of
school.
Parents will now see an explanation of the skills being tested and how their child compared
to the
school average, state average, district average and PARCC average, a
comparison to students in
other states taking the same test.
It does say their math scores lag behind
other schools, but that's not a fair
comparison unless New Orleans
schools used
to be better than average, which I highly doubt.
There's no way now
to make the
comparison perfect, but one preferred method would be comparing the choice payment
to what public
schools get from local property taxes and general state aids, we heard from researchers or
other officials at DPI, the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance and
School Choice Wisconsin.
An additional
comparison school sample of 13 small
schools of choice with a focus
other than STEM is being used
to help disentangle the effects of a STEM - focused program from those of small
school size and
school choice.
There are many ways of assessing student performance, but only standardized tests permit an accurate
comparison of teachers,
schools, and
school systems
to each
other and
to norms or established standards.
Another interesting
comparison: Over five years, state regulators removed 18
schools from scholarship programs, denying participation
to 18 applicants, with sanctions on many
others — a stark contrast
to public
school districts, which rarely (if ever) shut down poorly performing
schools.
The Equity Rating measures how well a
school serves the academic development of all students, looking specifically at: 1) the performance level of disadvantaged students on state tests in
comparison to the state average for all students, and 2) in -
school performance gaps between disadvantaged students and
other students.
This was followed in July 2017, by new evidence of learning gains in a midline - assessment demonstrating Bridge PSL public
schools experiencing accelerated learning in
comparison to their peers in
other public
schools.
After seeing triple - digit math gains in
comparison to other Texas
schools on STAAR (State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness) coming out of Willow Springs, KISD rolled out ST Math
to all 32 of its elementary
schools, with funding support from Toyota USA Foundation and Xerox.
The data demonstrates that students in Bridge PSL public
schools are experiencing accelerated learning in
comparison to their peers in
other schools.
In a «competitive marketplace» of
schooling within a geographic space, under this incentive structure, the goal is
to be that
school which most effectively cream skims — without regard for who you are leaving behind for district
schools or
other charters
to serve — while best concealing the cream - skimming — and while ensuring lack of financial transparency for making legitimate resource
comparisons.»
Public
schools are asked
to be competitive and act more like private entities, but there is little
comparison to the flexibility of the private sector in forcing public
schools to furlough teachers based on seniority rather than performance or
other important educational considerations.
Along with adjustments
to the ECS grant funding level, the budget adjustment agreement also alters the funding levels — in
comparison to the FY 2019 appropriated amounts contained in the biennial budget — for some
other state education grants, including the Excess Cost grant and grants for the Connecticut Technical Education and Career System, vocational agriculture programs, Priority
School Districts, and the Open Choice program.
Figure 5: Performance of students in the Branford
School District in
comparison to students from
other districts on the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC).