This valuable tool provides the answers in a user - friendly format, designed to allow easy
comparisons with previous studies, using a mix of charts, graphs and tables.
Administration of disease - nonspecific family functioning measures along with disease - specific questionnaires would have allowed for more comprehensive
comparisons with previous studies.
Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the indirect and direct exposure to 20 potentially traumatic events and its relation with PTSD in a Ugandan sample of senior 3rd year students and to perform cross-cultural
comparisons with previous studies examining this age group.
We will expand the study with children from the other participant countries and increase the follow - up period in
comparison with our previous studies, from two to five years.
Not exact matches
Future
studies with larger numbers of breastfeeding mothers could allow for paired
comparisons before and after an intervention, as well as analysis of the impact of independent variables like gender, year of training, age, or
previous breastfeeding experience.
In keeping
with previous studies comparing much smaller portions of the chimp and human genomes, the new
comparison shows incredible similarity between the genomes.
Previous studies have reported an increase in fatigue resistance in EDL muscles following genetic manipulation of Actn3 (40) and Pgc - 1α (41), although differing fatigue protocols preclude direct
comparison with the current data in the IL - 15Rα — KO mouse.
A
comparison wa made between their behavior change from the beginning to the finish of the research
with neural activity in a specific brain region which a
previous study had indicated is predictive of behavior change.
Using student - level data, they are able to surmount a criticism of the Skiba et al.
study by limiting the analysis of students involved in the same fight to a sample in which neither student had a
previous suspensions — so the only
comparisons involve students
with similar disciplinary records.
One possible explanation for these conflicting results is that almost all
previous empirical
studies have relied on
comparisons of students in states that adopted these reforms
with students in states that did not.
Previous cases of research had found that boys revealed stronger relationships
with their pets in
comparison to girls, but this
study proved otherwise.
This finding is consistent
with recent data highlighting the difficulty of reducing suicidal thoughts and behaviors among adolescents.42 We are unaware of any prior epidemiologic data on the lifetime treatment of suicidal adolescents, so there is no basis for
comparison of our findings
with those of
previous studies.
Comparisons of our prevalence rates
with those from
previous studies are hampered by the fact that there exist few Nordic, population - based
studies focusing on men's self - reported exposure to IPV.
The effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy in this
study was similar to that observed in patients who accepted treatment in the initial uncontrolled evaluation.10 The results differed, however, from those of the two
previous controlled trials of cognitive behaviour therapy, one of which was a non-randomised
comparison with a waiting list11 and the other a randomised
comparison with basic medical care.12 The possible reasons for the greater effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy in our
study include differences in the characteristics of the patients, longer follow up, and possibly less active medical care.
Third, no
comparison was done
with results obtained in
previous studies with the same tools in Italy neither in other Eastern or Western countries.
In
comparison with previous observation
studies that examined only general and not sexuality - specific peer interactions (for an exception, see Capaldi et al., 2001), that selected only one target per dyad for the analyses (e.g., Capaldi et al., 2001; Dishion et al., 2004; Patterson et al., 2000; Piehler & Dishion, 2007), and that typically included only male dyads (for exceptions, see Dishion, 2000; Piehler & Dishion, 2007), the current
study had several major strengths.
These
previous studies used a different analytical approach, which makes direct
comparison with our results difficult.