As a backwards -
compatible soft fork, however, this should not affect non-upgraded nodes much: These will continue to function as normal.
«It can be rolled out with a backward
compatible soft fork, which would be even easier if Segregated Witness is activated first.
Not exact matches
SegWit is a
soft fork that is completely backward
compatible, with network participants able to adopt it at their own speed.
But they share one significant benefit with
soft forks: extension blocks are backward
compatible.
«
Soft forks are backwards
compatible and opt - in,» shaolinfry argued in a follow - up email.
However later on, it was discovered that segregated witness could be added in backwards
compatible manner as a
soft fork.
SegWit is considered a «
soft fork», meaning it's
compatible with the old code, which also means it can be retroactively implemented on the entire Bitcoin Blockchain.
In a
soft fork, the new version remains backwards
compatible.
For this reason, privacy and scalability improvements are rolled out in a backward -
compatible manner in a process known as a
soft fork.
Bhardwaj referred to Segregated Witness (SegWit), a proposed
soft -
forking (backward
compatible) change to Bitcoin that includes an increase in the effective block size limit to more than 2 MB (after users upgrade to SegWit - enabled wallets), as a «small to medium level increase in the network capacity.»
Soft forks are backwards -
compatible changes that don't require all nodes to upgrade.
While
soft forks are seen as less disruptive in that they're backwards -
compatible, they can still be controversial when used to initiate changes not all cryptocurrency users agree with.
This new structure of a Bitcoin transaction is backwards
compatible and hence can be implemented with a
soft fork.
This makes
soft forks backward
compatible: nodes that did not upgrade should remain part of the same Bitcoin network.
a
soft fork is a protocol change that is backward
compatible which means the changes will be interoperable with the original blockchain's rules.
Think of
soft fork as an updated version of the protocol which is backward
compatible with previous versions.
A
soft fork is a rule change that is backward
compatible; which means the new rules can still be interoperable with the legacy protocol.
With a
soft fork, it is said that changes can be implemented on an opt - in basis because they are backward
compatible.
A hard
fork differs from a
soft fork in that the changes are not backward
compatible.
Prior to August 1, 2017, miners activated the backward -
compatible SegWit
soft fork.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin Core supporters, which, naturally, include the core developers of Bitcoin, advocate a solution called «Segregated Witness» that would be a «
soft fork», i.e. backwards
compatible, although it would take more development work not only for the core but for many other companies in the Bitcoin ecosystem.