Sentences with phrase «compelled by an order of the court»

«Unless compelled by an order of the court, the defendants will not pay our gratuities as approved by the government,» their statement said.

Not exact matches

Nigerian government now seeks a court order compelling the two companies to pay into the Federal government of Nigeria account with the Central Bank of Nigeria, the sum of USD 406,751,070 being the total value of the missing revenue from the shortfall / undeclared / under - declared crude oil shipments of the country, made by the companies to United States of America.

«Further attestation to the existence of the two forces of opposite direction under the Buhari's dictatorial presidency is the recent launch of online signature project spearheaded by a risen constitutional lawyer and Georgetown University law scholar, Ms Carol Ajie; for the purpose of compelling President Buhari to obey court orders and other judicial consequential pronouncements or resign or be impeached.

A statement issued and signed by his aid, Reginald Seth Dogbey, said: «Article 40, article 75, and Article 88 and the various parliamentary ratifications of the African Charter compel the above personalities representing the State of Ghana to obey the orders of the African Court of Human & People's Rights.

Justice Okon Abang who ordered the production of Dasuki in court however said that the ex-NSA may not be compelled to testify in the trial until his motion, praying for adjournment is fully determined by the court.

The Supreme Court has dismissed a case by NPP stalwart Dr Amoako Tuffour seeking an order to compel the Electoral Commission (EC) to announce results of the Special Voting on the day of casting.

He is also asking the Court for a declaration that an order by the Attorney General of the Federation and one Obono Obla of the Presidential Task Force on Recovery of Government Properties compelling him to vacate the aforesaid property without affording him a fair hearing, amounted to a denial of his fundamental human rights, unconstitutional and void.

The plaintiff also sought an order of mandamus compelling President Muhammadu Buhari to immediately sack both ministers in public interest and public morality based on the allegations of attempts to influence court decisions recently levelled against them by two Justices of the Supreme Ccourt decisions recently levelled against them by two Justices of the Supreme CourtCourt.

In a writ sighted by OTECFMGHANA.COM, Mr. Agyepong is asking the court to issue «an order compelling the first defendant to immediately cause to be retracted the defamatory statement via the same medium used in making them thus through the frequency modulation of the second defendant and to render an unqualified apology to the plaintiff via the same media.

There is prospect Nigerians keen on knowing the truth about alleged padding of the 2016 budget may soon have some answers, as the Federal High Court in Lagos has granted a bid by Socio - Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) «to seek an order of Mandamus to direct and compel the Federal Government to prosecute some principal officers of the National Assembly over allegations of padding and stealing of some N481bn from the 2016 budget.»

The minister made remarks in reaction to the order of an interim injunction granted by the National Industrial Court sitting in Abuja compelling the striking members of JOHESU to immediately resume duties.

Conservative Republican members of the Kansas legislature in 2005 tried to couple school spending that had been compelled by courts with a proposed amendment that would have prohibited courts from ordering the legislature to make appropriations.

Courts have consistently confirmed this in relation to article V (1)(c).837 For example, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied a party's attempt to raise a challenge under article V (1)(c) to oppose an order compelling arbitration, that is, before the arbitral proceedings had even taken place.838 The court noted that the provision could only be invoked by a party opposing enforcement of an award, which was not possible in circumstances where no award had been issued, and also unlikely where the party raising the challenge was the claimant in the would - be arbitration, and thus not the party who would be in a position to challenge any resulting arbitral award absent any counterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied a party's attempt to raise a challenge under article V (1)(c) to oppose an order compelling arbitration, that is, before the arbitral proceedings had even taken place.838 The court noted that the provision could only be invoked by a party opposing enforcement of an award, which was not possible in circumstances where no award had been issued, and also unlikely where the party raising the challenge was the claimant in the would - be arbitration, and thus not the party who would be in a position to challenge any resulting arbitral award absent any counterclaimcourt noted that the provision could only be invoked by a party opposing enforcement of an award, which was not possible in circumstances where no award had been issued, and also unlikely where the party raising the challenge was the claimant in the would - be arbitration, and thus not the party who would be in a position to challenge any resulting arbitral award absent any counterclaims.839

It may be by some other form of investigation or examination into his private concerns, as by opening his private and personal mail, searching his safe or his wallet, examining his private bank account, or compelling him by a forged court order to permit an inspection of his personal documents.

The application is started by the estate trustee by way of a notice of application to pass accounts (where the circumstances warrant it, a beneficiary may seek an order of the court compelling the estate trustee to bring an application to pass accounts rather than relying on the estate trustee to start the application of her own volition).

(a) lawful authority refers to lawful authority other than (i) a subpoena or warrant issued, or an order made, by a court, person or body with jurisdiction to compel the production of information, or (ii) rules of court relating to the production of records; and (b) the organization that discloses the personal information is not required to verify the validity of the lawful authority identified by the government institution or the part of a government institution.

Enforcement follows recognition and is required for the execution of the award, i.e. compelling a party to pay the sum of money ordered by the foreign court.

Even in cases where the author of the publication appears to be anonymous, we have obtained court orders to compel disclosure of the anonymous poster's personal information by website hosts and telecommunication companies, leading to successful trial and settlement outcomes for our clients.

«Lawful authority» in s. 7 (3)(c. 1)(ii) of PIPEDA must be contrasted with s. 7 (3)(c), which provides that personal information may be disclosed without consent where «required to comply with a subpoena or warrant issued or an order made by a court, person or body with jurisdiction to compel the production of information, or to comply with rules of court relating to the production of records».

[4] s. 7 (3), PIPEDA provides for disclosure without consent on a number of bases including in S. 7 (3)(c) if the disclosure is «required to comply with... an order made by a court... with jurisdiction to compel the production of information,...»

The test for civil contempt was articulated by the Supreme Court in Carey v. Laiken: (i) the order alleged to have been breached must state clearly and unequivocally what should and should not be done; (ii) the party alleged to have breached the order must have had actual knowledge of it; and (iii) the party allegedly in breach must have intentionally done the act that the order prohibits or intentionally failed to do the act the order compels.

Acquiring that exploit drove the government to pull back a court order, which would have compelled Apple to build software capable of disabling the iOS devices» security features, by effectively creating a backdoor for the iPhone.

The lawyer may then take legal steps to compel disclosure of the information either by issuing a subpoena to licensees to attend a proceeding as a witness or by obtaining a court order pursuant to the Rules of Court compelling the licensee to give their evidcourt order pursuant to the Rules of Court compelling the licensee to give their evidCourt compelling the licensee to give their evidence.