Our return expectations across most asset classes are at post-crisis lows, but we believe investors are getting
compensated for taking on risk in equities, selected credit / emerging markets (EM) and alternatives.
As investors, we deserve a rate of return that
compensates us for taking on risk.
Not exact matches
At the
risk of
taking sides
on this issue, it would appear that Amazon attempted to work out a system of compensation
for the publishers, although admittedly the terms of those agreements were confidential; nothing has been mentioned so far about how the authors were to be
compensated, either.
In other words, the outperformance is to
compensate investors
for taking on what's actually a higher level of
risk, a reflection of market supply - and - demand dynamics or the result of common decision - making biases.
Although corporate defaults are also
on the rise, investors are being
compensated for taking incremental
risk in credit markets.
Investors need to be
compensated for taking on additional
risk.
The majority of economists, however, agree that the concept of an equity
risk premium is valid: over the long term, markets
compensate investors more
for taking on the greater
risk of investing in stocks.
However, they must also be
compensated for the additional amount of
risk they're
taking on.
So, if your score is in this range, you will pay higher interest rates to lenders to
compensate them
for the
risk they
take on when lending to those with lower credit scores.
On the slight chance that you are able to obtain a loan on your own through a private lender without having to go through a credit check, the chances are that you will have to pay a substantially higher rate of interest in order to compensate for the lender taking on what they would consider to be a high risk loa
On the slight chance that you are able to obtain a loan
on your own through a private lender without having to go through a credit check, the chances are that you will have to pay a substantially higher rate of interest in order to compensate for the lender taking on what they would consider to be a high risk loa
on your own through a private lender without having to go through a credit check, the chances are that you will have to pay a substantially higher rate of interest in order to
compensate for the lender
taking on what they would consider to be a high risk loa
on what they would consider to be a high
risk loan.
An investor willing to
take on volatility or the potential
for losses should be
compensated for accepting that
risk.
High yield bonds typically offer better return potential than Treasurys or investment grade bonds as a way of
compensating investors
for taking on greater
risks.
But this brings us to one key problem in the world of investing — if we can measure return, and we can measure
risk by looking at volatility, then how do we know if we are being
compensated for the
risk we are
taking on?
She said: «As we look at the bond market today — you are certainly getting more
compensated for the interest rate
risk you are
taking on.
Conclusion Although there are many other factors to consider when deciding
on any investment strategy (your willingness to
take risk would be at the top of the list), the variable maturity approach to fixed income investing is based
on the sound investment philosophy that investors should
take risks that they are expected to be
compensated for in the long term.
Investors expect to be
compensated for taking on higher
risk.
Beta and its role in CAPM convey the basic idea that investors expect to be
compensated for taking on more
risk.
Right now, yields
for REIT's are about 3 % higher than government bond yields, meaning REIT investors are being well
compensated for taking on additional
risk.
Companies with debt / interest in excess of that
risk suffering: i) a significantly adjusted price
for their equity in the event of a takeover — acquirer will refuse to
take on debt, or will
take on debt but haircut equity to
compensate, ii) an eventual rights issue / placing to pay - down debt — this will probably hurt the share price and / or dilute intrinsic value per share significantly, or iii) investors will mark down company severely at some point.
But if it is perceived
risk that causes high stock returns, we can not say that investors are being
compensated for being willing to
take on risk.
Risk - Free Rate of Return (rf) The risk - free rate of return is used to see if you are being properly compensated for the additional risk you are taking on with the as
Risk - Free Rate of Return (rf) The
risk - free rate of return is used to see if you are being properly compensated for the additional risk you are taking on with the as
risk - free rate of return is used to see if you are being properly
compensated for the additional
risk you are taking on with the as
risk you are
taking on with the asset.
Opportunistic investors moved into junk bonds in late 2008 when, in the face of frozen credit, yields
on junk bonds went up to more than 20 %
on the back of falling prices and to richly
compensate investors
for taking up the
risk.
Ask yourself, is the return you are being offered high enough to
compensate you
for the
risk you are
taking on by putting your money in this investment?
Because these policies are not medically underwritten, the insurer is
taking on a much greater amount of
risk with its applicants — and because of this, the insured will be required to pay a much higher amount of premium in order to
compensate for this
risk.
This flat extra
compensates the insurance company
for the added
risk it is
taking on by approving the applicant.
This is to
compensate for the additional
risk the insurance company
takes on to cover an older policy holder.
This extra premium is to
compensate for the additional
risk the insurer is
taking on.
Because the applicants
on no medical exam life insurance policies are typically those who are considered to be of higher
risk, life insurance companies have to
compensate for the additional amount of
risk that they are
taking on.
I expect that «a la carte» services will become more common in future and sellers will pick up many of the costs presently paid
for by Realtors, but also expect commissions would have to drop to
compensate sellers
for taking on some of our
risk.
Risk - based pricing means compensating the lender for taking the additional risk on a borrower with a lower credit score (the average FICO score for a conventional loan was 753 in 2016, according to Ellie M
Risk - based pricing means
compensating the lender
for taking the additional
risk on a borrower with a lower credit score (the average FICO score for a conventional loan was 753 in 2016, according to Ellie M
risk on a borrower with a lower credit score (the average FICO score
for a conventional loan was 753 in 2016, according to Ellie Mae).