Not exact matches
It is scandalous that any
profession should indulge in a restrictive practice which, in the interests
of a privileged cadre, prevents some
of its
competent members from exercising their much - needed talents, and denies the nation the fruits
of costly apprenticeships for which it has had to pay good money.
It seems to me that if the
profession wants to remain «self - governing», the burden falls on all
members of the
profession to address this gap between licensed and
competent.
Like all professional regulators, the Law Society has two central mandates; ensuring that
members of the legal
professions are
competent and ensuring that
members conduct themselves properly.
The paths were mostly designed by Courts, the Bar or other governmental entities to allow already credentialed professionals (mainly
members of the Bar) to hold themselves out to the public as
competent, state - certified mediators, in addition to their being certified in their
profession of origin.
It's also necessary to consider that the majority
of «
professions» also limit membership numbers to ensure that all
competent, qualified and practicing
members are able to work in that
profession should they have the desire and drive to do so.....