Thus, the first step that NuSI - funded researchers will take is to test
the competing hypotheses on weight loss, which can happen relatively quickly.
Not exact matches
Yet the dominant
hypothesis today focuses
on competing for mates — that is, intimidating members of the same sex and attracting members of the opposite sex.
Once the first brown dwarf candidates were actually found, however, astronomers realized that it was actually quite difficult to definitely rule
on the validity of
competing hypotheses about how a substellar object was actually formed without having been there.
The typology includes logical problems, algorithmic problems, story problems (which have underlying algorithms with a story wrapper that amounts to an algorithmic problem), rule - using problems, decision - making problems (e.g., cost - benefit analysis), troubleshooting (systematically diagnosing a fault and eliminating a problem space), diagnosis - solution problems (characteristic of medical school and involving small groups understanding the problem, researching different possible causes, generating
hypotheses, performing diagnostic tests, and monitoring a treatment to restore a goal state), strategic performance, case analysis (characteristic of law or business school and involving adapting tactics to support an overall strategy and reflecting
on authentic situations), design problems, and dilemmas (such as global warming, which are complex and involve
competing values and which may have no obvious solutions).
The typology includes: logical problems, algorithmic problems, story problems (which are algorithmic problems with a story wrapper), «rule - using» problems, decision - making problems (e.g., cost - benefit analysis), troubleshooting (systematically diagnosing a fault, eliminating a problem space), «diagnosis - solution» problems (characteristic of medical school, which involve small groups understanding the problem, researching different possible causes, generating
hypotheses, performing diagnostic tests, and monitoring a treatment to restore a goal state), strategic - performance, case analysis (characteristic of law or business school, which involve adapting tactics to support an overall strategy and reflecting
on authentic situations), design problems, and dilemmas (such as global warming, which are complex and involve
competing values, and which may have no solutions).
I prefer to think of
hypotheses competing on an even field, rather than in terms of a reigning champion and a challenger.
Suggesting that the deep ocean has sequestered the heat and will eventually release it again sounds to me a lot like the
competing hypothesis that the oceans play the dominant role in regulating our climate and global temperature, something Bob Tisdale has been banging
on about for a long while, and seems to be gaining more and more traction.
The creators of the
competing hypothesis will have to focus
on the big picture too instead of attacking data sets (not that data sets shouldn't be recollected or reevaluated) or attacking interpretations or parts of interpretations.
Perhaps you prefer to ignore probabilistic calculations that are conditional
on competing hypotheses.
«Suddenly I don't think that I have all the facts, that the sober analysis of
competing hypotheses has not taken place, that the global consensus often bandied about is a fallacy — a variation of ad populum argument — and that our nation can not commit itself to irrevocable courses of actions based
on compromised science.»