When
competing legal research company Fastcase published a rendition of those same rules, Casemaker sent a takedown demand to Fastcase in December.
Not exact matches
I have said before and I continue to believe that for a
legal research company to
compete against the longstanding dominance of Westlaw and LexisNexis, having secondary content such as treatises and practice guides is the Holy Grail.
A few weeks ago, in a post here about Fastcase's addition of blog commentary from the LexBlog Network, I wrote that for any
legal research company aiming to
compete in the big leagues against the likes of Westlaw and LexisNexis, «secondary content is the Holy Grail.»