Not exact matches
GFI offers
competitive intermediary services in a variety of energy and commodity
markets around the world, including electricity, natural gas,
coal, freight derivatives and metals.
Secretary Perry's attempts to tip the scale in favor of uneconomic
coal and nuclear power plants to provide a «resilience» benefit that doesn't exist would have increased carbon emissions, raised costs to consumers, and distorted
competitive markets.»
That, in turn, would create the mass
markets and economies of scale for renewables that would bring down their prices and make them
competitive with
coal and oil.
An analysis of
coal plants in Texas found that cheaper wind and solar on the grid is contributing to a
market transformation where
coal is no longer cost
competitive.
PJM vice president Stu Bresler said the plan described in the grid operator's November 15 report was in the works well before the Department of Energy proposed rules to guarantee cost recovery for
coal and nuclear plants in the PJM region and certain other
competitive markets.
Australian
coal is becoming less
competitive, given its high cost operations in a highly
competitive market.
For as of this year, solar has become cost -
competitive with many energy sources — often beating natural gas on combined levelized costs and even edging out
coal in a growing number of
markets.
A host of recent studies have suggested much of the pipeline of new
coal plants the
coal mining industry is depending on may never be built as environmental concerns in key
markets such as China and India escalate and competition from gas and increasingly cost -
competitive renewables intensifies.
Moreover, building new
coal plants has become uneconomic — it is very capital intensive, the EU energy
market is experiencing an intense overcapacity and renewable energy technology has become more cost
competitive.
Additionally, they argue that the terminal would help make United States
coal more
competitive by opening up Asian
markets.
But again, on technologies like highly efficient ultra supercritical
coal or combined cycle natural gas (which I supported in above comments)-- what are some policies that would make the U.S. more
competitive in the $ 28 trillion world
market on new energy?
For years, the federal government has leased that land to
coal companies for below
market value, with almost no
competitive bidding.
Free
markets would be preferred, but the US failed to create
competitive power
markets under deregulation because it awarded old
coal and nuclear power plants all sorts of advantages including stranded cost subsidies, grandfather exemptions to environmental regs, preferential grid access, etc..
As cold - weather demand for gas caused the price of natural gas to increase,
coal became more
competitive in the
market and was dispatched earlier in the resource stack.
Back in April, DOE Secretary Perry issued a memo calling for a reliability study of U.S. power systems, expressing concerns that
competitive markets, renewables, and regulations were forcing retirement of baseload (i.e.
coal and nuclear) power plants critical to reliability.
With the double of the
coal tax, solar, wind and hydro electricity are all already now immediately
competitive in the Indian electricity
market against unsubsidized new imported
coal - fired power generation.
In the background is a growing resistance to wholesale
markets, led by utilities with substantial nuclear and
coal - fired generation who are seeking state subsidies to essentially put their thumbs on the scale of the
competitive wholesale
markets.
Photo: Vlasta JuricekMore good news on the renewable energy front Monday: The cost of onshore wind power has dropped to record lows, and in some regions is
competitive with electricity generated by
coal - fired plants, according to a survey by Bloomberg New Energy Finance, a
market research firm.
The international
coal market is
competitive and growing.
Conservatives are in a bit of an awkward position in that they support subsidies for «clean
coal» (
coal with carbon capture and sequestration) and nuclear power, but neither is
competitive on today's energy
markets.
While utilities in Ohio, New York and elsewhere have sought «around
market» charges after affiliated
coal and nuclear plants became less
competitive, Germany's large utilities are charting new paths forward as that country curbs its reliance on fossil fuels.
This proposal would reward
coal and nuclear plants in
competitive markets that store fuel on site, with the rationale being that these fuel sources are more fuel secure.
Additionally, Shell Global Solutions International B.V. (Shell) also qualified three Chinese companies for the manufacture of key equipment for the Shell
Coal Gasification Process (SCGP), in order to make the Shell technology more
competitive in the Chinese
market.