A number of factors could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those indicated by such forward - looking statements, including but not limited to, (1) our ability to open new restaurants and
food and beverage locations in current and additional markets, grow and manage growth profitably, maintain relationships with suppliers and obtain adequate supply of products and retain our key employees; (2) factors beyond our control that affect the number and timing of new restaurant openings, including weather conditions and factors under the control of landlords, contractors and regulatory and / or licensing authorities; (3) changes in applicable
laws or regulations; (4) the possibility that the Company may be adversely affected by other economic, business, and / or
competitive factors; and (5) other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time in our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10 - K filed on March 30, 2016 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10 - Q filed on August 15, 2016.
In today's online issue of U.S. News and World Report, Marilyn Schwartz, Ph.D., deputy director of the Rudd Center for
Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University in New Haven, Conn., notes that parents in states without strong
laws governing
competitive foods can still take action.
Six states had strict
laws restricting the sale of so - called
competitive foods — snacks and drinks sold in vending machines, school stores and during fundraising projects, which compete with school - served meals; seven states had weak
laws; and 27 states had no
laws governing
competitive foods in middle schools.
Jamie Chriqui, Ph.D., Bridging the Gap, discussed findings from research on the effect of state
laws and district policies related to
competitive foods.