Sentences with phrase «complainant by defence lawyer»

Detailed and thorough cross-examination of the complainant by defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger focused on instances of past aggressive behaviour by the complainant including previously biting the client and implausible and exaggerated aspects of her evidence.

Not exact matches

An Ontario university student is seeking leave to appeal a decision that his civil lawyer breached a deemed undertaking rule by forwarding confidential medical records of a female complainant to the defence lawyer representing the young man on sexual assault charges.

After a 4 day trial and extensive cross-examination of the Complainants by lawyer Stacey Nichols, as well as presentation of Defence evidence of other family members which refuted the Complainant's allegations, client was acquitted of all charges in the Ontario Court of Justice.

The complainant refused to allow the son to see D.P. Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger was hired and obtained all of the family court documents and used the filed affidavits by the complainant to establish material inconsistencies between her statement to police and the family court filings.

Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger, after careful analysis of the evidence, and during lengthy negotiations with the Crown's office, was able to establish that the facts as disclosed by the complainant, did not necessarily demonstrate an intention to commit a sexual assault but rather were misconstrued by the complainant as to the client's intended actions.

In addition Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger assailed photographs taken of the complainant several hours after the meeting with D.M. which were tendered by the Crown to establish that given the complainant's youthful appearance, D.M. failed to take all reasonable steps to ascertain the true age of the complainant pursuant to section 150.1 (4) of the Criminal Code of Canada.

Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger arranged for calls from the ex-wife (complainant) to be recorded by the client in order to obtain evidence of her true motivations.

Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger went through the voluminous information provided by police in a very detailed fashion including the witnesses statements and the statements of the two young ladies who were the «complainants».

Defence lawyer John Navarrete held various discussions with the Crown Attorney's office at 1000 Finch and provided information for their consideration including a possible motive to lie by the complainant stemming from her personal mental health issues.

In the complainant's statement, it was alleged that B.L.C. made numerous affectionate moves on the complainant, while in the casino, that were flatly rejected by the complainant, including the complainant intentionally standing away from B.L.C. Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger obtained the surveillance footage from the Casino.

The defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger, assisted by his senior paralegal Grace Condello, charted out the evidence, inconsistencies and the evidence supportive of M.L. M.L. had not seen his son in 9 months since being charged because the complainant had not complied with the family court order.

Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger extensively reviewed and analyzed the disclosure during the comprehensive defence investigation which included obtaining source documents from various sources, including the family law proceedings, to undermine crucial facts attested to by the complDefence lawyer Joseph Neuberger extensively reviewed and analyzed the disclosure during the comprehensive defence investigation which included obtaining source documents from various sources, including the family law proceedings, to undermine crucial facts attested to by the compldefence investigation which included obtaining source documents from various sources, including the family law proceedings, to undermine crucial facts attested to by the complainant.

Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger aggressively pursued defence investigation on fabrication by the complDefence lawyer Joseph Neuberger aggressively pursued defence investigation on fabrication by the compldefence investigation on fabrication by the complainant.

After extensive review of the prosecution evidence including surveillance recordings from the locations where the acts were alleged to have occurred (TTC stations) by defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger, and detailed cross-examination of the complainant giving rise to serious inconsistencies between the evidence and the surveillance recordings, the Crown agreed with the defence that there was no reasonable prospect of conviction.

The defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger disclosed email communications and then requested a re-interview of the complainants by a different police officer.

Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger transcribed all witness statements and created a detailed chart of all inconsistencies, as well as having drafted detailed disclosure requests seeking various critical pieces of information that were alleged to have been provided by the complainant.

In addition, Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger obtained occurrence reports of prior calls to police that established a pattern of aggressive conduct by the complainant — her husband.

Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger was able to establish that her version of events was unrealistic in relation to some admissions made by the complainant and the text messages.

Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger established material inconsistencies between various statements made by the complainant that undermined the complainant's credibility.

Further, expert psychiatric evidence obtained by Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger demonstrated that the complainant was acting in a highly provocative manner prior to and during her recording of the private discussion in an attempt to provoke a confrontation for the purposes of her laying charges.

Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger obtained copies of bank records and text messages supporting the defence theory that the allegations were motivated by the complainant's desire to empty the bank accounts and obtain more money from Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger obtained copies of bank records and text messages supporting the defence theory that the allegations were motivated by the complainant's desire to empty the bank accounts and obtain more money from defence theory that the allegations were motivated by the complainant's desire to empty the bank accounts and obtain more money from C.J.B..

Complainant alleged that she was assaulted and had her phone thrown away by P.F. Criminal defence lawyer Christopher Assie was retained.

Under cross-examination by Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger, the expert agreed that the pattern of drinking of the complainant is indicative of a «heavy» drinker and she would not doubt have a higher degree of tolerance.

Just prior to trial, defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger discovered that the other male party was charged with criminal harassment by the same complainant.

Further, the defence investigation, including the use of a private investigator hired by defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger, produced photographs of the alleged crime scene and surrounding area, which assisted in undermining the evidence of the complainant.

Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger had extensive discussions with the crown and was able to establish that the separation agreement stipulated that she still had rights to be at the matrimonial home and the ex-husband by physically removing the complainant committed an assault to which the client was legally permitted to defend herself.

After a thorough cross examination by defence lawyer John Navarrete of the complainant at the jury at trial, the client was acquitted of all charges.

At trial, defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger extensively cross-examined the complainant on her evidence and on contradictory evidence obtained by Neuberger during the defence investigation.