Sentences with phrase «complaint alleging a violation»

This order concerns violations by Spirit Airlines, Inc., (Spirit) of the requirements of 14 CFR Part 382 (Part 382) with respect to properly coding and recording its disability - related complaints in connection with required reporting to the Department of Transportation (Department) as well as providing dispositive responses to written complaints alleging a violation of Part 382.

This order concerns violations by Allegiant Air, LLC, (Allegiant) of (1) the requirements of 14 CFR Part 382 (Part 382) with respect to properly coding and recording its disability - related complaints in connection with required disability reporting to the Department of Transportation (Department), as well as providing dispositive written responses to written consumer complaints alleging a violation of Part 382, and related statutory provisions, 49 U.S.C. § § 41702 and 41705; (2) the Department's full - fare advertising requirements, 14 CFR 399.84; and (3) 49 U.S.C. § 41712, which prohibits carriers from engaging in unfair and deceptive practices and unfair methods of competition.

In addition, if an airline receives a written complaint alleging a violation of the Department's disability rules, the carrier must provide a written response within 30 days that specifically discusses the complaint, gives the carrier's view of whether a violation occurred, and states that the complaint may be referred to DOT for an investigation.

The association seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, and its complaint alleges violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and of the Equal Privileges Clause of the Indiana constitution.

Apr. 10, 2018), is noteworthy for its seeming less - than - rigorous review of the dismissal with prejudice of a complaint alleging violations of Illinois and Missouri consumer fraud statutes.

Somewhat reluctantly, he filed an ethics complaint alleging a violation of Article 16, as interpreted by Standard of Practice 16 - 13.

(e) In the event the respondent named in any complaint alleging a violation of the Code of Ethics is involved in any criminal litigation arising out of the same facts and circumstances giving rise to the complaint alleging unethical conduct, the complaint shall not proceed to a hearing before the Professional Standards Committee but rather shall be held in abeyance until the pending criminal proceedings have been concluded.

In the event the respondent named in any complaint alleging a violation of the Code of Ethics is involved in civil litigation or in any proceeding before the state real estate licensing authority or any other state or federal regulatory or administrative agency in a matter arising out of the same facts and circumstances giving rise to the complaint alleging unethical conduct, the complaint may, at the discretion of the Grievance Committee, or on appeal, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, proceed to a hearing before a Hearing Panel of the Board's Professional Standards Committee.

Call the Local Board of REALTORS ®: Local Boards of REALTORS ® will accept complaints alleging violations of the Code of Ethics filed by a home seeker who alleges discriminatory treatment in the availability, purchase or rental of housing.

If you believe that a REALTOR ® has violated one or more Articles of the Code of Ethics, you can file an ethics complaint alleging a violation (s) through the local association of REALTORS ® where the REALTOR ® holds membership or participates in a REALTOR ® association - owned / operated MLS.

This Disclosure Form also serves as a statement acknowledging that the buyer or seller, as applicable, was informed that any complaints alleging a violation or violations of T.CA 62-13-312 must be filed within the applicable statute of limitations for such violation set out in T.C.A. 62-13-313 (e) with the Tennessee Real Estate Commission, 500 James Robertson Parkway, Suite 180, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, Phones: [phone] or [phone].

The Association maintains a process and procedures to handle complaints alleging violations of the Code.

Not exact matches

On February 12, 2018, the Federal Trade Commission («FTC») revealed that it filed a complaint against the country's three largest dental supply companies, Henry Schein, Benco Dental Supply Company («Benco»), and Patterson Companies, Inc. («Patterson»), alleging violations of U.S. antitrust laws by conspiring to refuse to provide discounts to or otherwise serve buying groups representing dental practitioners.

The complaint submitted by Baby Milk Action was presented in the publication Nestlé's UN Global Compact cover up: How Nestlé's Shared Value reports cover up malpractice and bring the UN voluntary initiative for corporate responsibility into disrepute (NESTLÉ CRITICS, 2009) which included information from various civil society organisations (note 3) alleging violations in the areas of:

Accordingly on 11 June 2009 the UK civil society organisation Baby Milk Action submitted a complaint alleging that the reports posted on the UN Global Compact Office site and launched at the joint event were misleading and that Nestlé was, in truth, responsible for egregious violations of the Global Compact Principles.

Kihuen's campaign filed a complaint calling it a violation of FEC coordination laws, essentially alleging that the Sanders campaign was paying for an ad for Flores campaign.

The Seneca Nation called on Paterson to «publicly condemn and distance himself» from Bloomberg and stated that the nation's president reserves the right to file a complaint alleging a «human rights violation and a hate crime» with the Justice Department and several other agencies.

This was immediately followed by one Mr. Baah Acheamfour who proceeded to make a complaint to the police of the conduct of Afoko and his alleged spokesperson which he described as gross and flagrant violation of Article 3d (VIII) of the NPP's constitution under duties of a member which state that a member shall not initiate commence or prosecute any legal proceedings whatsoever against the party or any member of the party relating to party affairs without first exhausting the grievance procedure laid down in the constitution in respect of grievances against the party or any other members,» the letter said.

Any member of the Democratic Party of the County of New York may submit to the Committee on Ethics a written complaint alleging a specific violation of these Rules and Regulations.

Schneider said that Spota began his investigation soon after being contacted by Islip Town Councilwoman Trish Bergin Weichbrodt, who reported complaints that centered on alleged threats that Islip officials had made to candidates who scored higher that code violations would be filed on their homes if they did not decline fire marshal jobs.

Last week, the union filed a lengthy complaint with the city and with the federal Occupational Health and Safety Administration that alleged numerous health and safety code violations at the hotel after an inspection by union officials last month.

A recent Moreland Commission hearing revealed that the Board of Elections — whose two Republican and two Democratic commissioners must vote to pursue any alleged violation — has ignored most complaints.

Government watchdog groups — including the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, Common Cause New York, the League of Women Voters of New York State and the New York Public Interest Research Group — sent a complaint to the state's Committee on Open Government while the hearing was still under way on Tuesday afternoon, alleging violations of the state's Open Meetings Law.

The complaint alleges civil rights violations, including assault and battery, claiming that French was not in imminent danger when he opened fire.

The primary complaint of the suit, filed in October 2012, involved Digisec's alleged trade dress violations for use of Ashley Madison's «shush image,» which depicts a woman with her finger pressed against her lips.

In August 2011, following a complaint from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and Disability Rights Wisconsin (DRW), the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice launched an investigation into the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program and two private schools for alleged violations of federal disability law, i.e. the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint alleges that the Company was in violation of the Colorado Minimum Wages of Workers Act and the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act («TVPA»).

The complaint identified a variety of alleged violations perpetrated by Residents for a Better Bridgeport including failure to reveal donations and expenditures, as required by law.

Based upon a complaint I filed, Connecticut's State Election's Enforcement Commission has opened an official investigation into the alleged campaign finance violations of Residents for a Better Bridgeport, the political action committee that was created to support Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch's unsuccessful effort to eliminate Bridgeport's democratically elected Board of Education and replace it with one appointed by himself.

The complaints allege multiple violations of Connecticut law.

«This action will have a detrimental effect on the members of the Texas State Teachers Association and the students of the San Antonio ISD community,» the complaint reads, listing a number of alleged violations the SAISD board committed in initially approving the contract.

readers know, following complaints I filed with the Connecticut's State Elections Enforcement Commission, the Commission voted to authorize individual investigations into alleged campaign finance violations by Residents for a Better Bridgeport, Excel Bridgeport and Michelle Rhee and her Great New England Public Schools Alliance.

All complaints alleging discrimination are investigated to determine if there has been a violation (s) of the passenger's civil rights.

DOT investigates complaints from the public alleging violations of Title VI, and follows the process in the DOT External Civil Rights Complaint Processing Manual, Order 1000.18.

-- If a complaint to the Commission alleges a violation of this section with respect to intrastate telecommunications relay services within a State and certification of the program of such State under subsection (f) is in effect, the Commission shall refer such complaint to such State.

The complaint further alleges that Delta violated a 2010 order directing it to cease and desist from further code - share violations.

The complaint further alleged that British Airways advertises around - the - world travel using the «oneworld» booking engine (http://rtw.oneworld.com/), owned by oneworld Management Company, Inc. (oMC), which consistently misrepresents carrier - imposed surcharges as government taxes and fees.1 According to the complaint, by engaging in these practices, the carrier violated its contract of carriage and engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 41712.

On February 17,2004, the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings filed a thirdparty enforcement complaint against SatoTravel, Inc., alleging violations of 14 C.F.R. Part 257.

On April 11, 2012, the United States filed a Complaint alleging that the defendants agreed to raise the retail price of e-books, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1.

Moreover, the court's role under the APPA is limited to reviewing the remedy in relationship to the violations that the United States has alleged in its Complaint, and does not authorize the court to «construct [its] own hypothetical case and then evaluate the decree against that case.»

Whereas, Plaintiff, the United States of America filed its Complaint on April 11, 2012, alleging that Defendants conspired to raise retail prices of E-books in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 1, and Plaintiff and Settling Defendants, by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law;

(B) the impact of entry of such judgment upon competition in the relevant market or markets, upon the public generally and individuals alleging specific injury from the violations set forth in the complaint including consideration of the public benefit, if any, to be derived from a determination of the issues at trial.

On April 11, 2012, the United States filed a civil antitrust Complaint alleging that Apple, Inc. («Apple») and five of the six largest publishers in the United States («Publisher Defendants») restrained competition in the sale of electronic books («e-books»), in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1.

Your complaint to HUD should include your name and address, the name and address of the person or company you are complaining about; the address or some other way to identify the housing involved; a short description of the facts that make you think your rights were violated; and the dates of the violation you are alleging.

The 63 - page complaint, called an «accusation,» alleges that Ghumman and Alta View were negligent in their care of animals and engaged in unprofessional conduct that includes: failure to provide humane treatment; false advertising; acting as a pharmacy by compounding drugs; negligence and incompetence in administering medication; and numerous record - keeping violations.

Animal Control officers can really inspect all colony records upon demand, simply by claiming there is an «alleged violation of law» or if there is a complaint.

The office conducts routine inspections and investigates complaints of alleged violations of the law for animal shelters in Delaware.

In the first Complaint discussed in Animal Law Coalition's reports below, the court found the plaintiffs did not allege facts showing the RICO violations proximately caused their injuries.

A person may also file a written complaint with the Department of Education Office for Civil Rights regarding an alleged violation of Title IX online at:

Early in 2015, SolarCity, a solar panel merchant, filed a whopper of a complaint in federal court alleging that it had suffered antitrust violations at the hands of the Salt River Project, an Arizona electricity provider.