Sentences with phrase «completely different argument»

If your point is «well anthropogenic CO2 had to be created somehow and creating it might have done some nasty things» that's a completely different argument.

Whether or not the omission was strange or not is a completely different argument.

Its a completely different argument when interest rates go back up above 6 %.

Not exact matches

Claiming it is «impossible» to get him to consider different points of view, exasperated acquaintances of local man Kyle Dunham told reporters Wednesday that the 34 - year - old is completely unwilling to listen to even a single argument as to why ho.mose.xuality is an abomination.

Two completely different — and logically incompatible — arguments in favor of communion for the divorced and remarried have figured in the synodal process that led up to Amoris Laetitia.

I did not mean to upset when I said, «it's only a theory» I just tried to say that the theory is an open, on going, unbiased argument that is completely different from religious doctrines out there.

On such a planet, the argument for design would look completely different, yes?.

So the argument of Decastro, Long & Martin have nothing to do with the Warmack / Cooper argument as they are completely different postulates.

In effect the argument is that if you've been a soldier, and you have some of these kinds of symptoms, that you are very likely to be labeled as having PTSD; and in fact, maybe you're suffering from a completely different problem or something that's not even a really deep - seeded problem at all.

Have you ever noticed that if you're mad about one thing, it leads to arguments with your partner about something completely different?

Driven by strong emotions, stunted inhibitory control, and a drive for sensation, teenage arguments follow a completely different rule - set.10 As such, there is simply not enough overlap between adult and adolescent arguments to generate an easy «winner».

Besides introduction paragraph, thesis - led approach is completely different from an argument - led, regarding that fact that the main emphasis of a thesis - led approach is put on samples and your perception, when argument - led method operates with facts and arguments.

bloodborne arguably takes place in the 18th / 19th century while gothic architecture surfaced in the 12th / 13th centuries, so to make the argument that gothic = bloodborne is moot because they're two completely different time periods (separated by about 500 years).

Now I understand that I'm coming dangerously close to that fine line that defends shitty controls with an «it adds to the mood» argument, but I truly think Wander's janky movements is vital to that feeling of desperation and helplessness against the beasts, and suddenly having a different engine for the exploration would be completely bizarre.

I can understand Solid Snake enthusiasts being slightly ticked off that Raiden took the role of lead protagonist in the game, but my counter argument is that it was equally as good getting to experience Snake's antics from a completely different perspective.

Features are completely different from nfs features and this should be argument to convince players to install and play.

Your argument makes no sense you could use Uncharted compared to angry birds OBVIOUSLY uncharted has better graphics but they are 2 COMPLETELY different games angry birds doesn't need to look better yet it sold unimaginably more than uncharted.

Another flaw in Nexon's argument is LawBreakers and PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds are two completely different games.

Lawyerly argument was, a 4 is completely different than a 5, you can't say 5s increase with warming just because 4s do.

Please note: saying that we don't know and an argument from ignorance are completely different things.

You also seem to equate the site with a single person, presumably Kim Capria who is the main person being «debunked» by dailycaller, but the article in question is written by someone different, so this mostly ad hominem attack is completely irrelevant to the argument.

Sure, you could make an efficiency argument that solving one completely would be better than tackling 100,000 different problems at once.

Consoli's presentation dealt with a completely different issue: the necessity (his argument) of developing the hydrogen economy in order to address global warming.

This is especially true if the subject keeps causing fights or is often brought up in the heat of an argument about a completely different subject.