The three analogies: (1) whereas a pre-
electronic paper
record can be symbolized by a piece of paper in a file drawer, an
electronic record is like a drop of water in a pool of water, i.e., it is
completely dependent upon its ERMS for its existence, accessibility, and «integrity» (as that word is used in the
electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts; e.g. s. 31.2 (1)(a) CEA); (2) if expert opinion evidence were rendered admissible in the way that
electronic records are, there would be no evidence presented, nor cross-examination allowed, as to the qualifications of the expert witnesses, i.e., the «qualifications» of an
electronic record being the state of
records management of the ERMS in which it is stored; (3) going from a horse - powered transportation
system to a motor vehicle - based transportation
system has required a vast amount of new laws, regulations, and enforcement personnel, including police officers, judges, and lawyers, i.e., stepping up to a new technology requires that it be controlled by new laws and regulations, otherwise it will cause injury, damage, and injustice.
Better to increase the attractiveness of legal services by enabling lawyers to provide related services accompanying their legal services, e.g., family law lawyers providing financial planning advice, and law firms providing accounting and tax advisory work, and litigation lawyers working with experts who improve and maintain their clients»
electronic records management systems, because records are the most frequently used kind of evidence and are completely dependent on their records management systems for everything, particularly their «integrity» ( which is what the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 ( 1 ) ( a ) of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free do
electronic records management systems, because records are the most frequently used kind of evidence and are completely dependent on their records management systems for everything, particularly their «integrity» ( which is what the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 ( 1 ) ( a ) of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downl
records management
systems, because
records are the most frequently used kind of evidence and are completely dependent on their records management systems for everything, particularly their «integrity» ( which is what the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 ( 1 ) ( a ) of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downl
records are the most frequently used kind of evidence and are
completely dependent on their
records management systems for everything, particularly their «integrity» ( which is what the electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 ( 1 ) ( a ) of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downl
records management
systems for everything, particularly their «integrity» ( which is what the
electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 ( 1 ) ( a ) of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free do
electronic records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 ( 1 ) ( a ) of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downl
records provisions of the Evidence Acts require be proved for admissibility; e.g., section 31.2 ( 1 ) ( a ) of the Canada Evidence Act - see: Ken Chasse, «
Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free do
Electronic Records as Evidence,» and the other «records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downl
Records as Evidence,» and the other «
records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free downl
records as evidence» articles on «my SSRN authors page, for free download ) 。