Why lie and make
completely false arguments that are transparent?
Not exact matches
Both agencies acted with official city and state misconduct, and in both cases, honest, credible evidence was repeatedly dismissed and ignored, and so was the corruption that remains to date — where knowingly
false statements were made to discredit me (then later
completely reversed during oral
argument by my accusers), and both the DOI investigators (who appeared at my doorstep many times to collect evidence) and MTA Office of the Inspector General investigators invited me back to their headquarters (more than six times), from 1989 to 2008), and continued to take no action to restore and reinstate my city job, pension and social security contributions.
«Martins»
argument is based on a
completely false premise,» Pidot said in a written response to the court.
While I understand where this
argument comes from, I have to say that it's
completely false.
But first, nothing so far has been «thrashed» or «debunked» in that article, starting form
completely false statement (and non-sequitur
argument) like:
This
argument notes that the correlation is too good to support CO2 causing temp because CO2 is only one of many purported temperature drivers under AGW, so it supports the (reverse) temp causes CO2 hypothesis, in which case AGW is
completely false.
«Climate in Contention» in my Topical Index was
completely destroyed: the notes there now are a fraction of previous notes showing «Denierism» to be another incidence of propaganda «framing» using
False Argument to «sell» a position and defuse rational debate.