Faced with the need to rapidly reduce greenhouse emissions, many believe that energy efficiency and renewable energy sources can
completely replace fossil fuels and meet global energy demand.
We don't yet have the technological breakthroughs that could
completely replace fossil fuels.
You have ignored the point I made earlier about the massive environmental problems that would be caused if renewables were to be used on a scale that woud be necessary to
completely replace fossil fuel powered stations.
Not exact matches
«The quantities of methane produced by anaerobic digestion can diminish or even
completely replace the use of
fossil fuels in the production process,» says Mike Bambridge.
Closed anaerobic reactors generate large quantities of methane (CH4) from the organic materials in the wastewater that can diminish or even
completely replace the use of
fossil fuels in the production process.
Replacing fossil fuels completely by alternative, sustainable power generation methods is possible, the pundits insist, without harming economic growth.
Where hundreds of billions have been spent on so called renewable energy that is not renewable, does not in any way
replace fossil fueled generators but just displaces them, is
completely unreliable, is totally unpredictable, is vastly more expensive for consumers,.
I'm
completely in favor of solar supplementing or
replacing fossil fuel energy plants IF and WHEN they make economic sense.
There is enough biomass potential to
completely replace the entire (current)
fossil fuel consumption of the world, recently estimated to be 388 exajoules worth.
Three technologies can
replace fossil fuels completely within half a century, argues distinguished Indian journalist Prem Shankar Jha in his new book