it's far simply
a completely strong side earner for plenty people.
Not exact matches
The fundamentalist views are couched in
strong terms implying they are
completely factual, but the Mormon
side is peppered with words like «claimed.»
But he also has to try to cover Bryant up
completely just in case Gore takes it to the
strong side of the formation.
We should play the
strongest team and include some of the fringe players where the need might apply but not to send a
completely novice
side to get us through a european competition.
As I mentionned above that ive just watched all the Arsenal game 2007 and 2008, Ive personnaly gave up with this idea of strngthenin our defence.Its obvious, we need CDM, and I strongly recommend Toure for that job, but finally, I found out our main PBM: AW is a man who beleives in: THE BEST DEFENCE IS ATTACKIN.He has built the team that way.When I watched our 2007 games, i could see that most of these teams who has defeated us this season played exactly the same style of game last season but they couldnt perform so much as our attackin
side were so
strong for them so that they were always held at their own defensive
side.The game is
completely Psycological.At the 1st 10mn of the game, they try to attack @their best, but just when we start attackin then all their mdlfldr start to pull back coz most of our attack are all dangerous.And this is what makes the diffrence between the so called BIG 4 and the rest of the league.The Pbm isnt really that our defence is so weak, It is our attack which is WEAK.Durin the first half of this season, Our guys couldnt perform any attackin strategy planned by AW, coz 1st: they were new to it, coz they have only practiced it durin trainin session.2 nd: Some of the key players are gone.3 rd: Even AW did nt know where exactly is the best position for those new players, the likes of Nasri, Vela, and some of them were all subsitute last year.Plus they are all young players who can improve and change their style game after game.
We won't be touching the game if we're
completely honest, but if we had to have a wager on either
side then it would be Bolton purely because they have the potential, match winners if you like, in their squad to win a game of this magnitude and should come on
strong at The Reebok.
Normally Diaz can be
strong with the comedic
side of any character, but she
completely misses the mark with any of the comedy that comes with the character.
On the
side of the car, the running boards are neatly folded into the doors, and the door handles (as one might expect from a concept) are tiny and almost
completely hidden beneath the
strong character line running through the doors.
Overall it simply leaves a sour taste in my mouth and as much as it is a
completely optional
side of the game, competitive players may get frustrated that CP does not necessarily mean that you are a
strong opponent.