Sentences with phrase «completely understand all climate»

For example, climate change skeptics jump from the realization that we do not completely understand all climate - related variables to the inference that we have no reliable knowledge at all.

Not exact matches

The influence of climate change on this warm water invasion is an ongoing research focus among climate scientists and is still not completely understood.

(I take comfort in the fact that no one else can either) Even if I understood completely and could hypothesise the effect of the huge number of factors and correlations and feedback mechanisms that drive the climate I would not have accurate measurements over any significant timescale to prove this.

James - regarding your comment # 8, I completely agree with you that we need to apply models to better understand climate system processes in response to the spectrum of natural - and human - climate forcings and feedbacks.

John McCormick, please understand that others do in fact comprehend and fully embrace Wein's Displacement Law and Stefan Boltzmann, but are not yet convinced we completely understand the whole process of how the dynamic earth / ocean / atmosphere climate system works.

It follows from both of these fundamentally economic insights that proposing delay for decades is an irresponsible option that is offered by those who (1) really do not understand climate science and, (2) perhaps more importantly, really completely misrepresent the economics of the problem.

«The fact is that the climate sytem is far more complex than we can completely understand.»

And in addition, think about all the wasted energy the «climate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community» spent mitigating the impact of «deniers,» when «skeptics» could have helped out by listening more carefully to the «climate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community,» and trying to understand «the climate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community's» arguments, and adding to progress on increasing our understanding of the causes of climate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate variability and change — rather than apologizing or ignoring the input from scientists like Fred Singer — who deliberately lifts a conditional clause from a larger sentence, divorces it completely from context, and creates a fraudulent quotation in order to deliberately deceive, or Ross McKitrick who slanders other scientists on purely speculative conclusions about their motivations, or guest - posters at WUWT who call BEST «media whores,» or the long line of denizens at Climate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiClimate Etc. who falsely claim that the «climate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capiclimate community» ignores all uncertainties towards the goal of serving a socialist, eco-Nazi agenda to destroy capitalism.

I now completely understand why some people deny that anthropogenic climate change is happening.

If climate change is understood to be a moral issue, it would completely transform the way climate change policies have been debated in the United States for over three decades.

To my mind, the level of understanding and uncertanty of the climate completely undermines ANY claims of confidence.

Both significantly impact the global climate and both pose a puzzle to scientists since they're not completely understood.

Understand this, Douglas, I and a rapidly growing number of others all over the country and, indeed, the world, will continue to do our best to make sure the public is completely aware of the part you (and people like Dr. Keith and Dr. Ken Caldeira) have played in the criminal climate engineering cover - up.

On the other hand the projected positive feedbacks you support, which are COMPLETELY theoretical, depend on the LEAST understood aspects of the affect of water vapor and cloud formation, so the strong feedbacks PROJECTED are the least dependable, while the «OBSERVATIONS» used by Lindzen, Spencer, and others, support the lower estimates of climate sensitivity.

The influence of climate change on this warm water invasion is an ongoing research focus among climate scientists and is still not completely understood.

I completely agree with you retrograde, but I also think that their more thorough understanding of fundamental dynamics in their areas of specialty and being also much more well read in these areas would lead them to greater confidence in the wide ranging evidence for anthropogenic climate change.

These statements were taken completely out of context and ignored other readily available statements demonstrating that our researchers recognized the developing nature of climate science at the time which, in fact, mirrored global understanding.

Deep Climate found more plagiarism and a howler where Wegman & Said completely mangled the meaning of material they didn't understand when they copied it.

Our present approach of dealing with climate as completely specified by a single number, globally averaged surface temperature anomaly, that is forced by another single number, atmospheric CO2 levels, for example, clearly limits real understanding; so does the replacement of theory by model simulation.

I completely agree with Stefan — I can not understand at all why people think that climate change would only affect future generations (which, for many of us are our children anyway).

Gavin Schmidt replied to Steven Mosher over at Real Climate with the following comment which is also applicable in this case: «It's generally not the contrarians who drive better understandings of the science, because most of the contrarian points are completely irrelevant and are used as rhetorical, not scientific, points.

Specifically, while there are issues in the historical climate record like the pause that are not fully understood, we have hypothetical and reasonable explanations completely consistent with greenhouse theory.

I find it amusing that I am willing to write down the inviscid equations in 3 lines while Judith just cites complicated documentation that is completely unnecessary to read in order to understand the basic continuum problems with NWP or climate models.