It is
a completely wrong statement to say, we generally do better, when we are not expected to.
Not exact matches
He recently affirmed that JFK's
statement while running for President that he would not be a servant to the Pope was
completely wrong.
The fact that Romney didn't change his position is further reinforced by his last sentence («And --- and the --- and the president's
statement of my policy is
completely and totally
wrong.»).
And --- and the --- and the president's
statement of my policy is
completely and totally
wrong.
But I'll go ahead and say that it's
completely wrong of me to make such
statements.
brentnz, I hope you are okay with correction because your first
statement is
completely wrong.
If you do believe any of them, you may be totally
wrong and all of these statements are completely false, according to James E. McWilliams, author of a new book entitled Just Food: Where Locavores Get It Wrong and How We Can Truly Eat Respons
wrong and all of these
statements are
completely false, according to James E. McWilliams, author of a new book entitled Just Food: Where Locavores Get It
Wrong and How We Can Truly Eat Respons
Wrong and How We Can Truly Eat Responsibly.
If he needs time on the ball, a
statement i
completely disagree with, then going to one - touch football Barca or Bayern would be a step in the
wrong direction, if he wants a club that fits his style of play.
If I'm
wrong then I'll hold my hands up but what I said would be more akin to an incorrect
statement and wouldn't come close to being as much of a libel case as, to take a (oough cough)
completely random example and this isn't aimed at anyone in particular, accusing referees of being bent
The general
statement or opinion that «eating fat makes us fat» is
completely wrong.
I know full well, however, that any given
statement, or any given conclusion, by any of the RC contributors could be partially or
completely wrong.
[Response: Actually this comment is a good example of definitive
statement that is
completely wrong.
You
statement of what the AGW «Hypothesis» is is totally
completely and utterly
wrong!
Your
statements are not
completely wrong but insufficient to explain the observations comprehensive.
Experiments 4 & 5 clearly demonstrate that this
statement — «With the atmosphere now heated exclusively by conduction from surface to atmosphere, the highest temperature that the atmosphere could reach under such conditions would be -18 C.» — is
completely wrong.
If Dr. Meier is so
completely wrong on the
statement of «second lowest ever,» what else of what he said is also exaggerated?
By not specifying which climate models you are talking about, and making
completely general
statements like this, you are guaranteed to be
wrong.
If you need examples of why something is
wrong don't use false
statements to make a point, it just makes you look
completely wrong.