Sentences with phrase «complex judgment in the court»

Only 17 days elapsed between the hearing on November 6 and this morning's per curiam opinion.Evans J.A. delivered a complex judgment in the Court of -LSB-...] Read more

Not exact matches

A recent Supreme Court decision tackled two issues that have proven complex in Nova Scotia law: summary judgment and limitation periods.

With HR 993, which would amend the state constitution to create a statewide court specializing in business - to - business cases, Georgia legislators would directly address that lack of confidence by improving judgment predictability, increasing speed, and prioritizing judicial expertise in complex commercial litigation.

(Sources: Mary Jane Hatton and Joseph James, Case Management in the Family Court: A Guide to Implementation, Office of the Chief Judge, Ontario Court (Provincial Division), May 1995; Patrick LeSage and Michael Code, Report of the Review of Large and Complex Criminal Case Procedures, «Judicial Case Management, Especially at the Pre-trial Stage,» November 2008; Margot Gibb - Clark, «Where judgment is swift,» The Globe and Mail, February 28, 1995, p. B16.)

While it will be interesting to follow how this summary judgment motion progresses, this case illustrates that the expanded evidentiary powers on a summary judgment allow the Court to require that further oral evidence be adduced to assist with determining whether a genuine issue requiring a trial exists, even where the matters in dispute deal with complex technical issues.

On October 1, 2010, Ontario Superior Court Justice J. N. Morissette granted a $ 455.7 million judgment in Jeffrey and Rudd v. London Life, a complex class action brought against two insurance companies regarding their use of surplus earnings held in an account for the benefit of holders of London Life insurance policies (the «PAR Account»).

«I conclude that all the claims of Imperial [Tobacco] and the other tobacco companies brought against the government of Canada are bound to fail,» Supreme Court Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in the long, complex, and unanimous 9 - 0 judgment.

This practice, which was also suggested in Combined Air, is put forward by the Supreme Court as being appropriate for challenging «lengthy, complex motions» for summary judgment that would «not sufficiently advance the litigation or serve the principles of proportionality, timeliness and affordability.»

While there are a number of other issues involved in this complex case, including claims that the judgment was obtained by fraud, the facts before the Court were simple: there was a final judgment in Ecuador against Chevron for US$ 9.51 billion.

Elly's work at Boies Schiller focused on major high - stakes disputes, including representing Apple in its global antitrust litigation against Qualcomm; Midtown Acquisitions LP, a Davidson Kempner affiliate, in its multi-jurisdictional judgment enforcement against Essar Global Fund Limited; A1 noteholders in their successful High Court litigation and settlement against the Canary Wharf Group; a major hedge fund in relation to complex High Court proceedings against Terra Firma Capital Partners» Four Seasons Healthcare Groups; and several significant commercial and investor - state arbitrations.

Since 2009 Stephen has been the lead advocate in the complex fraud and asset recovery proceedings known as JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov, in which over 70 significant judgments have been given so far in England (including 15 in the Court of Appeal).

When handing down judgment, Mummery LJ said that in his experience, this case involved «the most complex employment issues ever to have been considered by this court.»

For additional sources asserting that federal courts grant summary judgment more frequently than state courts, see Howard B. Stravitz, Recocking the Removal Trigger, 53 S.C. L. Rev. 185, 185 n. 1 (2002)(«[F] ederal courts are more likely to grant summary judgment to defendants»); JoEllen Lind, «Procedural Swift»: Complex Litigation Reform, State Tort Law, and Democratic Values, 37 Akron L. Rev. 717, 769 (2004)(differing state and federal summary judgment standards «make it much more likely that a defendant in federal court will obtain summary judgment than a defendant in state court»); Kristen Irgens, Wisconsin Is Open for Business or Business Just As Usual?

Author: Evan Ivkovic, J.D., Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Hepburn v AlarmForce Industries Inc., released on October 6, 2017, by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in London, the court dismissed a franchisee's summary judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual issues were complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine issues requiring a trial»In Hepburn v AlarmForce Industries Inc., released on October 6, 2017, by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in London, the court dismissed a franchisee's summary judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual issues were complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine issues requiring a trial&raqCourt of Justice in London, the court dismissed a franchisee's summary judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual issues were complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine issues requiring a trial»in London, the court dismissed a franchisee's summary judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual issues were complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine issues requiring a trial&raqcourt dismissed a franchisee's summary judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual issues were complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine issues requiring a trial»).

The judgment on modified universalism deals with complex cross-border insolvency issues and the extent to which the Guernsey Royal Court can assist foreign insolvency proceedings and remains the leading judgment in this area.

As an attorney in the Supreme Court Division of this major New York City real estate litigation firm, Suzanne handled a wide variety of complex state and federal court cases, including declaratory judgment and injunctive actions, commercial foreclosures, workouts, representation of cooperative and condominium boards of directors and representation of real estate owners in all phases of bankruptcy litigation, we well as real estate transactCourt Division of this major New York City real estate litigation firm, Suzanne handled a wide variety of complex state and federal court cases, including declaratory judgment and injunctive actions, commercial foreclosures, workouts, representation of cooperative and condominium boards of directors and representation of real estate owners in all phases of bankruptcy litigation, we well as real estate transactcourt cases, including declaratory judgment and injunctive actions, commercial foreclosures, workouts, representation of cooperative and condominium boards of directors and representation of real estate owners in all phases of bankruptcy litigation, we well as real estate transactions.

To provide an answer to the titled question, this month Lawyer Monthly reached out to the Law Offices of Scott Warmuth, where Attorney Nathaniel Clark explains, with a complex court judgment as the foundation, the ins and outs of autodialing and robocalls in the US.

Looking ahead, the problem the Ecuadorian plaintiffs will face in enforcing their judgment is not Chevron's complex structure of wholly - owned subsidiaries; rather, it is the US court decision holding that the judgment was obtained through corruption.

He has served as arbitrator, counsel, and expert witness in commercial and investor - state disputes under the ICC, ICSID, UNCITRAL, and VIAC rules, and has litigated complex transnational matters in the U.S. courts, including actions involving the enforcement of foreign law and foreign judgments.

In Hepburn v AlarmForce Industries Inc., released on October 6, 2017, by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in London, the court dismissed a franchisee's summary judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual issues were complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine issues requiring a trial»In Hepburn v AlarmForce Industries Inc., released on October 6, 2017, by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in London, the court dismissed a franchisee's summary judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual issues were complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine issues requiring a trial&raqCourt of Justice in London, the court dismissed a franchisee's summary judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual issues were complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine issues requiring a trial»in London, the court dismissed a franchisee's summary judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual issues were complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine issues requiring a trial&raqcourt dismissed a franchisee's summary judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual issues were complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine issues requiring a trial»).

The $ 3 million judgment in favour of the 85 owners of the Riverwest complex was rendered by B.C. Supreme Court Judge William Grist, who ruled that Delta had not adequately enforced Part 5 of the province's building code, which requires that a roof shed or drain water.

B.C. municipalities may soon be awash in legal claims after a $ 3 million court judgment was rendered against the City of Delta, a developer, a builder and an architect for failure to meet proper building standards for the Riverwest condominium complex.