They take into consideration
the complex nature of human beings.
Not exact matches
Understanding that by
nature,
humans will often walk away from a system that
is overly
complex, modern brokers do an excellent job
of supplying interfaces that
are straightforward and user - friendly.
It
is far more challenging when trying to replicate processes
of nature, because
nature is wildy more
complex than any
human engineering, but as we get smarter and learn more we come closer adn closer to
being able to simulate natural conditions and create the expected results.
Nevertheless, by virtue
of our collective
human powers — our capacity for
complex symbolic thinking, the sophistication
of our tools, our ability to steward
nature, and our demonstrated interest in telling both
nature's story and our own —
human beings also transcend
nature.
Whitehead did work out a
complex theory
of value, but my point here
is only to indicate that Whitehead's way
of understanding
human beings as part
of nature both requires that we extend the ethical discussion and gives us clues as to how to do this.
your understanding
of the change process
is very simplistic, because your mind
is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas as shown in thousands
of years
of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity
of religious belief
is necessay because
nature through his will
is requiring this to happen, we
are being educated by God in the events
of history.In the past when there
was no
humans yet Gods will
is directly manifisted in
nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty
of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception
of abuse
is just part
of the
complex process
of educating us through experience.
The debunking frame
of mind
is one which, first
of all, recognizes that any
human choice
is composed
of a
complex mixture
of motives and pressures; such
is the
nature of human motivation and activity.
One way
of viewing the religious crisis
of our time
is to see it not in the first instance as a challenge to the intellectual cogency
of Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, or other traditions, but as the gradual erosion, in an ever more
complex and technological society,
of the feeling
of reciprocity with
nature, organic interrelatedness with the
human community, and sensitive attention to the processes
of lived experience where the realities designated by religious symbols and assertions
are actually to
be found, if they
are found at all.
The
human encounter with
nature is far too ambiguous and
complex to
be subsumed under the single emotion
of fear.
Frustration
is not new to
human nature; but as life becomes more
complex and the means
of satisfying material desires more numerous and alluring, frustration at failure to find the deeper satisfactions increases proportionately.
Once the exceptional, but fundamentally biological,
nature of the collective
human complex is accepted, nothing prevents us (provided we take into account the modifications which have occurred in the dimensions in which we
are working) from treating as authentic organs the diverse social organisms which have gradually evolved in the course
of the history
of the
human race.
In short, the
Nature we know from modern science embodies and reflects immaterial properties and a depth
of intelligibility... To view all these extremely
complex, elegant and intelligible laws, entities, properties and relations in the evolution
of the universe as «brute facts» in need
of no further explanation
is, in the words
of the great John Paul II, an «abdication
of human intelligence».»
The intricacy and unity
of the
human situation before God
is not less dynamic and
complex than the one we encounter in
nature when we explore the energetic world
of the atom or
of a sidereal system.
Unlike Pilgrim, with its several moments
of intense oneness with
nature, or Holy the Firm, with its more
complex treatment
of nature as a site
of worship, Dillard here
is bound by the project
of the book, which has to do with
human design and artifice, to see how far she can go in resisting all humanizing
of nature.
What hinders and even prevents us from advancing beyond this point
is our evident inability to conceive
of anything more organically
complex or psychically centrated than the
human type emerging in
Nature as it now
is.
Man
is ontologically no more or less real than any other kind
of complex, and
human orders
are continuous with other orders
of nature.
If Universe came into existence suddenly, then how Science can justify the existence and creation
of Nature, the Planets, the gamut
of microorganisms to the
complex human beings, males and females, the power to reproduce... I wonder if all these just appeared from nowhere!
An interesting study
of christological models has
been written by John McIntyre.4 The «two -
natures model» (which he takes as a single
complex model involving both divine and
human natures) has dominated Christian thought, but it has a number
of limitations; it
is tied to the Aristotelian categories
of substance and attribute, and it tends to view the incarnation as the assumption
of an abstract
human nature rather than the personal individuality
of a particular man.
This
is the biblical perspective
of creation: that we
are born into a world that
is given to us and not something
of our own making (Genesis 1 - 2, Psalm 8); that
humans have a place within it but not the place (Job 34:14 - 15); that the whole
of this creation
is interconnected and in constant communication with itself in a
complex way (Rom 8:29 - 23) and that
nature experiences destructive consequences as a result
of human disobedience
of God (see for example Genesis 3, 1 Kings 17 - 18, Romans 8).
Moreover, even with respect to those highly
complex organisms (like
human beings) which can, now and again, catch a glimpse 0f God's consequent
nature, the problem
of theodicy doesn't return.
The building
of the Church as a community with
complex organizational structure, with manifold functions and leaders, with various responsibilities to the society around it, can easily degenerate into the building
of religious clubs,
of sororities and fraternities and
of national associations for the promotion
of good causes, if the understanding
of the Church's purpose,
of its responsibility to God,
of the
nature and action
of God,
of man and his history,
of the meaning
of the Church's work in all the
complex of human activity and
of the interrelation
of the various aspects
of its work
are lost to view.
Due to the
complex nature of the tear film, it
is difficult to design an artificial tear solution that
is identical to
human tears.
However, Lungarella also cautions that the
nature of curiosity in biological entities, including
humans, remains extremely
complex and poorly understood: «I
am not sure if it
's possible to map curiosity onto an algorithm.
«We now really see how genetically
complex autism
is,» says Rita Cantor, a professor in residence at the David Geffen School
of Medicine at the University
of California, Los Angeles, who studies
human genetics and psychiatry and
is a co-author
of the new study, which
was published online June 9 in
Nature.
«The ability to communicate through language
is unique to
human beings, and the existence
of fully functional,
complex languages in a different physical modality makes sign languages a natural laboratory for investigating the
nature of human language and cognition in our species,» concluded Prof. Sandler.
Concludes Peng, «given the ubiquitous and
complex nature of tuberculosis, it
is fortunate that the Kirschner group's work
is rapidly advancing our understanding
of the mycobacterium's interaction with the
human host.
This tool, which associates genetic mutations with various
complex diseases,
was presented in the journal
Nature Methods and has
been included in the international consortium Pan-Cancer for the analysis
of human tumours.
«This
is one
of the very first studies
of human iPSC models for type 2 diabetes, and it points out the power
of this technology to look at the
nature of diabetes, which
is complex and may
be different in different individuals,» says C. Ronald Kahn, MD, Joslin's Chief Academic Officer and the Mary K. Iacocca Professor
of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.
In
nature, predatory hunting takes the form
of highly
complex behaviors that
are common to most jawed vertebrates, including
humans.
human complex fabric
is itself miracle
of the noble
nature.
He
is caught in a moment in which the release
of a technically - perfect and
complex film about the nucleus
of human nature is something we almost take for granted, a fault that lies entirely within us, or if none
of this applies to you, in me.
These
complex and often subtle rules
of the culture
are connected to ancient aspects
of our
human nature that have
been around for a long time, have survived in many different cultures and will survive in the new virtual worlds that
are rapidly appearing.
Though large in scale, her work
is intimate in
nature — and the grand gesture
of this mural should touch pedestrians and those passing in cars in deeply personal ways, as the work points to the
complex layers
of all
human experience.
Some landscape painters convey reality in compellingly quotidian detail, reflecting or critiquing the
complex relationship between
humans and
nature; others construct neo-byzantine visions
of the future that may thrill or terrify; some work intuitively to give form to the ephemeral, conveying that which can not
be spoken; and many bend or break accepted rules
of vision, reminding us that perception itself
is both a privilege and a discipline.
Athens - based Christiana Soulou makes
complex drawings that investigate the
nature of being human and its many conditions.
In the 60s, Dubuffet's work gradually became more graphical in
nature and the occasional
human and animal figures
were replaced by
complex scenes made up
of contour lines around «cells» in bright colours, as can
be seen at the exhibition in the Rijksmuseum Gardens.
While his work
is quite literal and simple, the use
of his body reflects the
complex nature of the
human condition.
Like the dogmatic religious thought it so bizarrely and unwittingly mimics, thought about climate change
is a way
of * hating
human beings * for their
complex and aggressive
nature.
As we discussed in our recent piece «Robot, Esq.: Four Reasons Lawyers Shouldn't Fear
AI and Automation Legal Tech», there
are critical limitations on the ability
of existing, non-general
AI to replace
human beings in legal practice — including the truly bespoke
nature of certain tasks, the lack
of sufficiently relevant and tailored data sets to train algorithms to handle even semi-bespoke tasks (given the
complex cocktail
of idiosyncratic considerations that good legal counsel comprises), and the non-empirical or data - driven aspects
of the practice
of law — involving emotional intelligence, communication, and persuasion — which I believe
are core to providing effective legal services.
The
complex nature of human attachment and social interaction with caregivers might
be one domain in which direct parallels with the animal literature
are limited, potentially related to the fact that the attachment relationship between children and caregivers
is a necessary scaffold for development
of numerous uniquely
human capacities, including emotion regulation and language (49, 50).