The paintings in Sea Legs look like vibrant abstractions but are in fact made up of thousands of dots, methodically applied according to
complex numerical systems.
But actually figuring out how to do this for such
a complex numerical system is no easy task, and then getting people to agree on what tests to actually use is probably hopeless, and finding resources to fund such an activity is a fantasy.
Not exact matches
When the geometry of such a
system is specified, the simulator allows the user to vary primary and secondary scattering foil material and thickness and to see results in approximately 100 milliseconds, about 10 million times faster than Monte Carlo simulations, which are simulations and computational algorithms that rely on random sampling to obtain results for extremely
complex problems that have only
numerical solutions.
Experience with solution algorithms, data assimilation methods and tools, coupling of components and processes, nonlinear and linear solvers, limiters, and / or other
numerical issues common with
complex codes within earth
system models of varying complexity
To be clear, I understand that the climate
system involves
complex physics (e.g. N - S equations) and intractable
numerical problems.
While the
numerical prediction method has proven itself very valuable in some areas, it is useless in others, particularly
complex, coupled, non-linear
systems.
Doing this renders the D = S assumption invalid, as we have an equilibrium occurring (an unstable one, but an equilibrium) without D = S being true, which leaves economists with few tools to work with aside from
numerical simulation and the under - developed branch of economics dealing with
complex systems analysis.
Knowledge of internal control
systems and procedures, with the ability to complete
complex numerical calculations.