We all know that annuities are more
complicated than index funds.
Not exact matches
The intrinsic portion distortion problem with the glycemic
index ultimately led scientists to come up with the idea of glycemic load, which is better
than the GI but still imperfect and too
complicated.
Touma just wants to keep a low profile, but when a nun named
Index stumbles into his life, things get more
complicated and dangerous
than ever!
Via mutual funds /
indexes this can get a little more
complicated (voting rights etc tend to go to the mutual /
indexing company rather
than the holders of the fund), but is approximately the same thing: the fund buys assets on the open market, then holds them, buys more, or sells them on behalf of the fund investors.
You don't even need
complicated science to conclude that investing in low - cost
index funds is almost certain to generate higher long - term returns
than investing in high - cost actively - managed mutual funds (where the managers try to beat the market by stock selection or market timing).
What
index of complexity exists, to say that the 21st century is so much more
complicated than the 20th, 19th... such that it requires a radically new form of political organisation?
The consensus enforcers don't even want there to be an
index — admitting to an entire axis of perspectives would make the debate far more
complicated than the simple matter of right - vs - wrong, good - vs - bad or science - vs - denial that they want it to be.
In cases like these that have the potential to become more
complicated later on down the road, many times the «business» will elect to take out a permanent cash value life insurance policy, such as
indexed universal life, on the individuals in question rather
than try to make predictions on which term length would be most appropriate.