Description: A set of reading strategies that students apply in collaborative groups to improve
their comprehension of content area text and increase conceptual learning.
Not exact matches
Harvard Graduate School
of Education will work with the Strategic Education Research Partnership and other partners to complete a program
of work designed to a) investigate the predictors
of reading
comprehension in 4th - 8th grade students, in particular the role
of skills at perspective - taking, complex reasoning, and academic language in predicting deep
comprehension outcomes, b) track developmental trajectories across the middle grades in perspective - taking, complex reasoning, academic language skill, and deep
comprehension, c) develop and evaluate curricular and pedagogical approaches designed to promote deep
comprehension in the
content areas in 4th - 8th grades, and d) develop and evaluate an intervention program designed for 6th - 8th grade students reading at 3rd - 4th grade level.The HGSE team will take responsibility, in collaboration with colleagues at other institutions, for the following components
of the proposed work: Instrument development: Pilot data collection using interviews and candidate assessment items, collaboration with DiscoTest colleagues to develop coding
of the pilot data so as to produce well - justified learning sequences for perspective - taking, complex reasoning, academic language skill, and deep
comprehension.Curricular development: HGSE investigators Fischer, Selman, Snow, and Uccelli will contribute to the development
of a discussion - based curriculum for 4th - 5th graders, and to the expansion
of an existing discussion - based curriculum for 6th - 8th graders, with a particular focus on science
content (Fischer), social studies
content (Selman), and academic language skills (Snow & Uccelli).
In this webinar, Dr. Sharon Vaughn, executive director
of the Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk at The University
of Texas at Austin, will discuss strategies for teaching students vocabulary and
comprehension within
content area texts, and how iLit provides an effective way
of implementing these strategies.
The CALS construct is defined as a constellation
of the high - utility language skills that correspond to linguistic features prevalent in oral and written academic discourse across school
content areas and that are infrequent in colloquial conversations (e.g., knowledge
of logical connectives, such as nevertheless, consequently; knowledge
of structures that pack dense information, such as nominalizations or embedded clauses; knowledge
of structures for organizing argumentative texts) Over the last years, as part
of the Catalyzing
Comprehension Through Discussion Debate project funded by IES to the Strategic Educational Research Partnership, Dr. Paola Uccelli and her research team have produced a research - based, theoretically - grounded, and psychometrically robust instrument to measure core academic language skills (CALS - I) for students in grades 4 - 8.
This teacher - friendly guide integrates a variety
of reading skills and strategies into your
content -
area instruction to improve
comprehension of textbook reading and other informational text.
Teaching students how to adapt their approach to a text based on its
content area is a key part
of comprehension.
«Ninety - nine percent
of the teachers in middle schools and high schools are prepared to teach in their
content area, not to teach
comprehension in their
content area,» said Catherine...
She was associate director
of the National Research and Development Center on English Language Learners (2005 — 2009) that examined the effect
of instructional practices that enhance vocabulary and
comprehension for middle school English language learners in
content areas.
Applying a Cohesive Set
of Comprehension Strategies to
Content -
Area Instruction.
His professional strengths include benchmarking, data collection & analyses, early assessment / diagnosis / intervention, closing the gap through equitable opportunities in education for disadvantaged populations,
content area reading
comprehension processes, and elements
of literature frameworks.
The exemplar lessons provide teachers with the tools to model the effective use
of comprehension strategies to increase understanding
of content -
area texts.
However, when teachers modeled reading
comprehension strategies commonly used in each subject
area, ELLs and other low - level readers learned to delve more deeply into a variety
of texts to analyze, understand, and master the
content.
Disciplinary literacy is framed as «
content area reading instruction, or a way
of teaching cognitive strategies across various
content area classrooms to promote
comprehension.»
These strategies can be implemented into all grade levels and
content areas, and support a wide - range
of instructional topics, including: literacy, mathematics,
comprehension, classroom management, transitions and many more.
While teaching the reading
comprehension strategies is primarily the responsibility
of the English / Language Arts teacher, the strategies are used in all
content areas, simply because students have to read and understand information within all
content areas.
We are being told that our evaluation system will require our full
comprehension and maintenance
of: measures
of teacher practice observation option selection forms, evaluator forms, consistent update
of class lists / rosters, observation options A, B, C, D, the Matrix, and MOSL options (project based learning assessments, student learning inventories, performance based assessments, and progress monitoring assessments), not to mention how this plays out for what people teach (elementary / middle / high school, alternative assessment, English as a New Language,
content areas, etc).
The November issues
of EL and ASCD Express on «Tackling Informational Texts» were so popular, we've returned to the topic with even more practical strategies and advice for working with complex texts and developing deep
comprehension across all
content areas.
Using findings from a study
of 545 teachers in 33 schools in Maryland, they found that when students had more opportunities to read and teachers integrated literacy instruction in the
content areas, the result was increased reading
comprehension, conceptual knowledge, problem - solving skills in science, and motivation to read.
Specifically, these papers argue for a significantly expanded role for
content -
area learning in grades K - 5 in terms
of the instructional time typically allocated in conjunction with a substantial reduction in the instructional time allocated to reading
comprehension instruction using basal reading programs.
This research - based, data - driven program builds an understanding
of the role literacy plays in academic achievement and reinforces the skills needed to address student performance challenges in reading
comprehension and
content areas.
Tennessee also requires middle school teachers to pass the Praxis Teaching Reading: Elementary Education test, which, under the heading «reading
comprehension strategies across text types,» requires teachers to know «how to select and use a variety
of informational, descriptive, and persuasive materials at appropriate reading levels to promote students»
comprehension of nonfiction, including
content -
area texts.»
In this study, authors compared the effects
of two experimental multiple - strategy approaches (
content -
area comprehension and vocabulary) to typical fourth - grade social studies instructional practices.
Applying a cohesive set
of comprehension strategies to
content area instruction.
Vermont's standards for early childhood education teachers make no mention
of informational texts and only require that a teacher «employs a range
of instructional approaches to support
comprehension across the
content areas.»