Not exact matches
As the Pope says, «
given such a grave
situation, we need now more than ever to have the courage to look the truth in the eye and to call things by their proper names, without yielding to convenient
compromises or to the temptation of self - deception.»
Other
situations might arise when
giving Caesar what is his might
compromise allegiance to God, but this is not one of them.
I eat about 80 % primal (i allow a bit of sway for protein supplements and cheeses / creams), but I was wanting to go over my diet and figure out how much I need to supplement
given the amount of red meat I eat, if i could eat salmon for half my meals I most certainly would but in my current
situation I'm stuck with beef
compromising at least 70 % of my total meat intake followed by chicken and what fish I can get in there.
The
compromises, however,
give rise to «worry
situations,» characterized by acute angst on my part about particular holdings, even when the Fund does not sell those holdings.
I don't know so much about the particular
situation regarding the funding of climate research but it seems apparent that politics has competely overtaken science, so on this particular issue I don't doubt a deal will have to be made and
given that there are those in positions of influence who would quite happily scrap all funding for climate research altogether I guess such a deal would represent a genuine
compromise.
The grammatical and ordinary sense of the words used in s. 233 of the Criminal Code supports the conclusion the legislator did not intend to restrict the availability of infanticide to
situations where the psychological health of the woman was substantially
compromised or where a mental disorder was established; the statutory language also shows there is no requirement for a causal connection between the disturbance of the accused's mind and the act or omission causing the child's death; but there is, however, a required link between the disturbance and not having fully recovered from the effects of
giving birth to the child or of the effect of lactation consequent on the child's birth ̶ in either case the disturbance must be «by reason thereof».
More importantly, and for the reasons already
given, doing so in this case would visit upon the plaintiff an unduly punitive sanction — one that fails to
give any weight: (1) to the challenges associated with forecasting how a court might assess her loss of future earning capacity claim; and (2) to the plaintiff's
compromised ability to accurately evaluate her own
situation.
To
give you an example let's look at a
situation where a government
compromises all entry and exit nodes of an anonymization network (while encryption remains intact) and how it affects users with two distinct anonymity sets (S1, S2).
In that case, something that's a good
compromise situation for the landlord is if a retailer has sales below a specific amount for a
given period of time, then the retailer can get out of the lease.