Back then, it said that the planet was warming at a rate of 0.2 C every decade — a figure it claimed was in line with the forecasts made
by computer climate models.
The key was to ensure that the way clouds form in the real world was accurately represented
in computer climate models, which are the only tool researchers have to predict future temperatures.
The «consensus» «experts» and billion
dollar computer climate models predicted that human CO2 emissions would generate accelerating, catastrophic global warming.
Back then, it said that the planet was warming at a rate of 0.2 C every decade — a figure it claimed was in line with the forecasts made
by computer climate models.
The papers questioned everything from the relative role of natural mechanisms in changes to the climate system vis - à - vis increased CO2 concentrations, the allegedly «unprecedented» nature of modern climate phenomena such as warming, sea levels, glacier and sea ice retreat, and the efficacy and reliability of
computer climate models for projecting future climate states.
Eilperin glosses over the fact that this latest UN climate «report» is a strategically timed political document peppered with
unproven computer climate models that
The U.S. physicist agrees there may now be thousands of temperatures in the range of 415 - 604 degrees Fahrenheit automatically fed
into computer climate models and contaminating climate models with a substantial warming bias.
In a paper published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, my co-author and I use a three -
dimensional computer climate model to examine the role of geothermal heating on planets orbiting M - dwarfs.
Even better statement would be «Finding problems with individual station data somehow
affects computer climate model projections or it really should because you can't rely on a model that does not use real data for confirmation».
This latest research is significant, because it involves the use of 19
advanced computer climate models, ones that have had the effect of these warming tongues of the oceans, built in.
Theoretical computer climate models have been consistently wrong for more than 30 years... overwarming global temperatures compared with actual satellite measurements by a factor more than twice higher.
=== > Fifth, we know that the $ billion $
super computer climate models used by these same scientists are fatally flawed, thus absolutely worthless regarding future global and regional climate predictions...
«Global temperatures continue to level off, despite predictions from
vaunted computer climate models and strident claims of climate catastrophe within and beyond the college campus.»
Using computer climate models, scientists estimate that by the year 2100 the average global temperature will increase by 1.4 degrees to 5.8 degrees Celsius (approximately 2.5 degrees to 10.5 degrees Fahrenheit).
Those catastrophic climate predictions of doomsday that proponents of human - made global warming rely are based on massive, complex,
costly computer climate models - also know as simulations and virtual climate reality.
Eilperin glosses over the fact that this latest UN climate «report» is a strategically timed political document peppered with
unproven computer climate models that violate the basic principles of forecasting and that even the UN does not call «predictions.»