Sentences with phrase «computer model outputs»

We are helping you to understand that there are other plausible explanations for global warming, and the assumption that it is due to CO2 is based only on opinionated papers hand - waved through the peer review process by friendly referees [while skeptical papers rarely see the light of day], and by computer model outputs, which are invariably unable to predict the future climate, or even today's climate with all available past data as the input.

Look around, make observations, real world observations, not computer model outputs.

Researchers use computer model outputs, such as this image from the Community Earth System Model, to study climate dynamics.

However, it is still not enough to recognize that it alone likely puts their entire computer model output in question.

They should either comparing nowadays HadCRUT3 data with computer model output or start over and parametrize the new computer models by using HadCRUT4 data.

Instead, we find that «uncertainty» is actually being used to express the statistical PRECISION of the computer modeling output sets with respect to each other, not with respect to the real world.

They are not alone as all parts of climate science lack data, use estimated data, rely on computer model output based on no data, and ignore natural causes of weather and climate change.

By taking this approach he actually helps provide some overall balance on this issue because most main stream media reporting on AGW is nothing more than IPCC cheerleading and the repetition of suspect computer modelling output.

The Global Warming Policy Foundation's International Temperature Data Review Project plans to examine the data input, not just the «global warming» computer model output.

Satellite data is not a computer model output.

If the computer models (and AR5) significantly understate the time frame or effects of AGW, then it really does not matter whether stakeholders read computer model output, the latest drool by a curve fitter, or the Farmer's Almanac.

Not exact matches

It speaks of operations research, systems analysis, technological forecasting, information theory, game theory, simulation techniques, decision theory, Delphi method, cross-impact matrix analysis, statistical time - series, stochastic models, linear programming, input - output economics, computer based command and control systems, and so on.

Running these data through a computer model, they found that they could get the experimental results and model output to agree only when they included two charmonium pentaquarks in the lambda - b decay process — one having a mass of 4.45 gigaelectronvolts (GeV) and the other a mass of 4.38 GeV.

From computer models, he found that counter-rotating vertical turbines could be arranged in such a way that a vertical wind farm has a higher power output per unit of area than a horizontal farm, upward of 10 times the energy density.

In this technique, scientists initiate a computer model with data collected before a past event, and then test the model's accuracy by comparing its output with observations recorded as the event unfolded.

The computer model provides engineers with the nerve output generated by a given stimulus, which can then be recreated in a prosthetic by electrically stimulating the nerve through an interface implanted in the body.

In other words, whereas the new satellite measurements call into question computer models of solar output, it does not change the fundamental physics of human - induced global warming.

No matter how powerful the computer used or how impressive the model output, any model of a natural system is only as good as the authors» understanding of the interaction between the physical laws that define their subject and the potential of simple small - scale interactions to produce large - scale complexity, more readily summarised as:

Power continues to be sourced from Aston's 4.7 - liter V - 8, although a remapped engine computer reportedly grants it an unspecified power increase over the 2010 model (we imagine total output is somewhere in the neighborhood of 450 - 500 horsepower).

Ex Privately Owned, 20» «Turbine» alloy wheels, Automatic headlights, Front park aid, «Performance» seat - driver, «Performance» seat - passenger, Rain sensitive windscreen wipers, IP insert (light aluminium), Wind deflector, Variant: F - TYPE, 8 - speed automatic transmission, «Performance» braking system, 6 - way part - power front seats, 8 inch touch - screen display, Air conditioning, Anti-lock braking system (ABS), Automatic climate control, Bi-function HID Xenon headlights, Driver's airbag, Dynamic Mode, Dynamic Stability Control, Electric Parking Brake (EPB), Emergency Brake Assist, Engine immobiliser, Engine: AJ126 3.0 V6 supercharged, Exterior door mirrors: electric ¸ heated, Front LED signature lights, Headlights power wash, Interior mirror: auto - dimming, Jaguar 180W sound system with single CD / DVD, Jaguar SmartKey system, JaguarSense, Model Year: 2014, Navigation Pack (Europe), Navigation system, Parking aid with rear sensor, Passenger airbag, Pedestrian Contact Sensing System, Rear parking aid with touch - screen, Side airbags, Sports seats, Sports suspension package, Starter system: Stop / Start, Steering: Right Hand Drive (RHD), Trip computer, 5 inch central TFT display (190mph), Ambient interior lighting, Bluetooth connectivity, Brake calipers: silver, Bright finish side vents, Digital radio (DAB), Door handles: deployable, Electric steering column, Electrically - operated convertible roof, Electronic Brake - Force Distribution (EBD), Engine power output: 340PS, Jaguar 250W sound system, Jaguar Tyre Repair system, Keyless start, LED rear tail lamps, Paddle shift: black, Partial electric passenger seat, Rain / Ice / Snow mode, Rear axle Open Differential, Rear spoiler: deployable, Remote control central locking, Roll - over protection bars, Sill treadplates: metal with «Jaguar» lettering, Sports exhaust, Twin dials with 5 - inch TFT colour display, Xenon headlights with LED signature DRL, Black mesh / chrome grille, Bonnet louvres (black), Centre - mounted twin exhaust pipes, Chrome instrument cluster dial rings, Drivetrain: rear wheel drive (RWD), Foot pedal: standard, Graphite interior accents, IP facia (PVC), Leather steering wheel, Morzine headlining, Power adjustable steering column, Satin chrome roll - over protection bars

Ex Privately Owned, 20» «Kalimnos» alloy wheels, Air quality sensing, CD autochanger, Heated front windscreen, 16 - way power front seats, 6 - speed automatic transmission, Bowers & Wilkins Premium, Exterior door mirrors: heated ¸ power-fold ¸ memory ¸ approach lights, Heated and cooled seats: front, Keyless entry, Luxury Seat Pack, Premium suedecloth headlining, Rear view camera, AutoLux leather seats, Heated leather steering wheel, «Performance» braking system, 7 inch colour touch - screen, Adaptive Dynamics, Anti-lock braking system (ABS), ARTS, Automatic climate control, Automatic headlights, Bi-xenon headlights, Central locking, Cruise control, Cruise control with automatic speed limiter, Driver's airbag, Dynamic Stability Control, Electric front windows, Electric Parking Brake (EPB), Emergency Brake Assist, Engine immobiliser, Exterior door mirrors: body - colour, Exterior door mirrors: electric ¸ power-fold, Front Media Interface, Front park aid, Headlights power wash, Interior mirror: auto - dimming, Jaguar SmartKey system, JaguarDrive Control, JaguarDrive Selector, Model Year: 2013, MP3 compatible, Navigation Pack (Europe), Navigation system, Navigation system & DRG, Parking aid with rear sensor, Passenger airbag, Pedestrian Contact Sensing System, Premium sound system, Rear spoiler, Steering: Right Hand Drive (RHD), Trip computer, Bluetooth connectivity, Boot plinth: chrome, Bright finish side vents, CD tuner, Digital radio (DAB), Engine power output: 385PS, Exterior door mirrors: power ¸ heated ¸ memory, Front and rear parking aid, Intrusion sensor, Jaguar Tyre Repair system, LED daylight running lamps, LED rear tail lamps, Locking wheel nuts, Rain sensitive windscreen wipers, Automatic headlight levelling, Centre - mounted twin exhaust pipes, Chrome grille, Chrome side window surrounds, Console stitching (ivory), Daylight running lamps, Drivetrain: rear wheel drive (RWD), Floor mats: leather - edged, Foot pedal: standard, IP stitching (ivory), ISOFIX child seat anchorage, Memory function, Twin cupholders

As an environmental scientist myself, with more than 10 years experience working with hydrological computer models, I am very wary of policy formulated on the output of models, especially with respect to a system as complex and poorly understood as the Earth's climate system.

There is, however, a point to be made about exercising caution when evaluating the forward - looking output of a computer model, particularly when those models are used to advocate policy changes on the assumption that the computer model accurately simulates the earth's climate, and more particularly when there is no demonstrable track record of the predictive accuracy of the model.

And I still maintain referencing science in this context is all wrong anyway, as this warming nonsense is simply the output of (poorly constructed) computer models, or computer games as they are known to the younger generation.

Overall, the submissions reinforce the impressions of sceptics viz. * the IPCC process is politically driven * IPCC is still indulging in (uncritical) selection bias * IPCC is still giving unjustified credence to the output of computer models * IPCC's handling of statistics is very poor * IPCC's conclusions are not robust At least the submissions attest to the fraudulence of the IPCC's pretense of presenting itself as an objective and impartial assessor of the literature.

Their prognostications are based on incomplete theory and computer models, the soundness of which is looking less and less as reality diverges more and more from the model output.

It bears repeating that the output of computer models isn't «evidence» of anything, but I'm sure you know that.

Lots of toy computer models, which have different outputs, meanin that at the very best, only one can be right.

The part of the chart to the right of 1ºC / 500GtC is nothing more than the output of a computer model.

Next they'll try to link meteor showers, and solar output to AGW with a computer model.

The hardest part for me was understanding that in their papers they often present «evidence» as if they had measured it when they have in fact only MODELLED something with some computer program and interpreted the output of the program, calling it evidence.

The entire output of computer climate models begins with the assumption that pre-industrial levels were measurably lower.

Support is based on the estimated annual output of the behind - the - meter turbine, at the proposed site, as determined by computer modeling.

Still, I guess you can't blame the Unis or the academics for grabbing the cash and kudos before the whole edifice of AGW is shown to be based on little more than the output from computer models based on human programming.

Solution: Until climate models are verified as being capable of somewhat accurate forecasts (predictions, scenarios, etc.), policymakers and taxpayers should completely ignore any climate simulation output that is a result of today's computer models.

It's not that computers are causing warming, it's that the faulty computer model programs are outputting data that (incorrectly) suggests warming.

The lack of a history match in the Canadian model output shows that the modeling team have ignored a fundamental requirement of computer modeling.

The output of computer models have cost the taxpayers billions of dollars and seem to drive policy decisions.

First, was the simplistic application of statistics beyond an average in the form of a straight line trend analysis: Second, predictions were given awesome, but unjustified status, as the output of computer models.

They're totally unjustified from the computer model inputs and outputs and the failure of every single prediction or scenario.

«Better computer models will inform future operational decisions to maximize power output and the operational life of these facilities,» said Imperial.

Answer: Global warming is not an output of computer models; it is...

Wrong — it's not that computer models are «bad» — it's that they're 1) incomplete, 2) fail to have the predictive power that's claimed for them, 3) model outputs are not «evidence» but only representations of what would be evidence IF the climate were programmed to match the models, 4) unvalidated and therefore unreliable.

Earlier this year, a comparison was done using the GISS global temperature observations dataset versus an earlier version of the NASA / GISS computer climate model output, as of 2015 year - end.

It only appears in the output of mathematically dubious area - averaging computer models.

Man - made systems (including ill - posed computer models) with positive feedback rely on various external devices to maintain bounded output.

Computer models are an essential tool in understanding how the climate will respond to changes in greenhouse gas concentrations, and other external effects, such as solar output and volcanoes.

Fraedrich & Blender did find long - range persistence on century time scales, but only for fluctuations (not for temperature), and only in the output of computer model runs.

Computer models and their output are not evidence of anything.

Most modern climate researchers have grown up on computer models of climate and are used to believing in the model output.