Sentences with phrase «computer model predictions»

If the temperature plateau continued for another 10 years, would that be enough to cast doubt on the climate computer model predictions?

But that raises the question: If the temperature plateau continued for another 10 years, would that be enough to cast doubt on the climate computer model predictions?

Three books were important to their message, Paul Ehrlich's The Population Bomb (1968) and Ecoscience: Population, Resources and Environment (1977) co-authored with John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar, and Meadows et al., Limits to Growth, published in 1972 that anticipated the IPCC approach of computer model predictions (projections).

«The reason why Dr MÃ ¶ rner, formerly a Stockholm professor, is so certain that these claims about sea level rise are 100 per cent wrong is that they are all based on computer model predictions, whereas his findings are based on «going into the field to observe what is actually happening in the real world».»

From the start IPCC computer model predictions were wrong so they switched to projections and scenarios but were still wrong.

The observation confirmed computer model predictions.

So, they didn't actually simulate sea level changes, but instead estimated how much sea level rise they would expect from man - made global warming, and then used computer model predictions of temperature changes, to predict that sea levels will have risen by 0.8 - 2 metres by 2100.

Either way, whether the global temperature pause continues or not, temperatures have risen much more slowly than United Nations computer model predictions.

Excerpt: Nearly two dozen prominent scientists from around the world have denounced a recent Associated Press article promoting sea level fears in the year 2100 and beyond based on unproven computer models predictions.

The growth rings of trees provided the evidence for reconstructions of what climatologists call the warm Medieval period, and the researchers matched the picture from the past with 17 different computer model predictions of the climate later in the 21st century.

Scientists Claim Computer Model Predictions are «Useless Arithmetic» - February 20, 2007 — Orrin H. Pilkey, a coastal geologist and emeritus professor at Duke and his daughter Linda Pilkey - Jarvis, a geologist in the Washington State Department of Geology, wrote a book in 2007 entitled «Useless Arithmetic: Why Environmental Scientists Can't Predict the Future.»

Dr. Courtillot notes that IPCC climate computer models do not correlate with observations and that temperature trends vary substantially between North America and Europe (which is contrary to IPCC computer model predictions).

«Current climate developments are at the very worst end of the computer model predictions,» he says.

To validate their computer modeling predictions, researchers performed experiments in human cancer cell lines, mouse liver samples and primary human hepatocytes.

Their experimental results closely matched the computer model predictions and also corresponded to the available clinical data on the action of the ventricular twist.

The credibility of these computer model predictions — used by governments to determine global warming policy based on future climate risks — have been under increasingly intense scrutiny for years.

So their computer model predictions really are just complicated science fiction.

Chu's assertions «quite simply being proven wrong by the latest climate data» — Computer model predictions are not «evidence»]

In the case of climate change, those making the assumptions demand that we act immediately to avert planetary crises based solely on their computer model predictions.

For example, two computer model predictions of monsoon rains for Africa showed completely opposite results.