At the same time, the professional development initiative was
conceived as an argument for the sort of professional learning that the standards would require.
Not exact matches
His
argument, part of which appeared in these pages («Leading Children Beyond Good and Evil,» May 2000), is that moral education
as presently
conceived almost inevitably ends up by thinning out moral content, removing the sharp edges of judgment, avoiding normative traditions of moral experience, and thus stifling the factors most crucial to the formation of character.
For that
argument may perhaps amount to this, that perfection is conceivable only
as the property of an existing individual, and not of merely possible individuals (whereas we may
conceive the nature of Mr. Micawber, for example,
as not in fact the nature of an existing man).
They might
conceive of their
arguments or differences
as scrimmages for the larger game of life.
Conceived as we now
conceive them,
as so many fortunate escapes from almost limitless processes of destruction, the benevolent adaptations which we find in Nature suggest a deity very different from the one who figured in the earlier versions of the
argument.
It seems that there are further basic
arguments which Hartshorne could level against Craighead's claim, charging, for example, that it is a fallacy of composition to assert that because we can
conceive of the nonexistence of some things we can
conceive of the nonexistence of all things.4 Craighead has in fact anticipated that fallacy charge
as it applies in this issue (ECCC 122f).
The first possibility is that the proofs for the existence of God are «empty tautologies,» like the ontological
argument which Marx stated in the form: «What I
conceive for myself
as actual is an actual conception for me.
For Leclerc, however, the loss of immediacy (which is always present in the case of a normal serial society) forms the main
argument for
conceiving God
as a society, because Leclerc considers «perishing» to be metaphysically required for every prehensibility, including God's (Review of William Christian, An Interpretation of Whitehead's Meta physics, Journal of Philosophy 57 [1960], 138 - 143; henceforth cited
as RWC).
The show was
conceived from the beginning
as an
argument against Flaubert, Tolstoi, Dostoyevski, etc..
Patrick Jones: It's another
argument, but I don't see how,
as an abstract painting, you can
conceive light in a painting unless you use your memory of what light looks like in experience.