Zeta immortality, which combines features of Delta and Epsilon immortality,
conceives of the future life as an archetypal or imaginal world, along the lines suggested by Carl Jung and Henry Corbin.
Not exact matches
He never thought, after the Greek fashion,
of soul as pure being, capable
of disembodiment, but spoke, as his Jewish contemporaries did,
of future life in terms
of bodily resurrection, and on that basis he discussed
life after death with the skeptical Sadducees, protesting only against the popular, contemporary ways
of conceiving the raised body and its uses in the next world.
It is significant that there are an increasing number
of those who believe that God's
life itself must be
conceived as having an element
of adventure and movement into an open
future, else we can not
conceive that He enters sympathetically into our human experience.23
Whether this
future is
conceived as eternal
life for the individual, or a new heaven and a new earth for mankind, or as the conquest
of evil in or beyond human history, the trajectory is toward the
future, the eschaton.
God's grace is not radically thought, so long as it is
conceived as a possibility in the
future instead
of being grasped as a reality in the present; for what right would a man have to assert the grace
of God, if he did not see it revealed as a concrete reality in his own
life?
In its primitive form, it did not mean that the reflective individual
conceived of himself as having had innumerable prior
lives and as destined for many
future ones.
The larger context through which our total situation may be transfigured is best
conceived in terms
of Civitas Dei, or the Kingdom
of God, «which is not in Time at all — either present,
future or past — and which differs from all temporal mundane states in the radical way
of being in a different spiritual dimension, but which, just by virtue
of this difference
of dimension, is able to penetrate our mundane
life and, in penetrating, to transfigure it».
I'm new to the ramifications and specific processes involved, but am pursuaded this is the likely model for
future publication projects that most benefit the first person on the food chain: the writers / artists who
conceived them, who are trying to make some kind
of living doing what they do best, hoping to find an audience for their work as a * first * resort rather than wearing themselves out with full - time day jobs
of no comparable skill or education preparation — but that pay the bills, maybe — and that leave little energy and reserves for their art.
He discusses Pop Art's place in art history; his initial feelings about being considered a Pop artist; the influence
of Los Angeles and its environment on his work; his feelings about English awareness
of America; a discussion
of his use
of words as images; a discussion
of the Standard Station as an American icon; a discussion
of the notion
of freedom as it is perceived as a Southern California phenomenon; how he sees himself in relation to the Los Angeles mural movement (L.A. Fine Arts Squad); the importance
of communication to him; his relationship with the entertainment world in Los Angeles and its misinterpretation
of him; his books; collaboration with Mason Williams on «Crackers;» his approach toward
conceiving an idea for paintings; personal feelings about the books that he has done; the importance
of motion in his work; a discussion
of the movies «Miracle» and «Premium;» his friendship with Joe Goode; his return from Europe and his studio in Glassell Park; his move to Hollywood in 1965; the problems
of balancing the domestic
life and the artistic
life; his stain paintings and what he hopes to learn from using stains; a disscussion
of bicentemial exhibition at the L.A. County Museum: «Art in Los Angeles: Seventeen Artists in the Sixties,» 1981; a discussion
of the origin
of L.A. Pop as an off shoot from the American realist tradition; his feelings about being considered a realist; the importance for him
of elevating humble objects onto the canvas; a discussion on how he chooses the words he uses in his paintings; and his feelings about the
future direction
of his work.
Playing with the language
of architectural presentation by showing models and renderings for the
future in combination with historical maps and buildings from the past, the artists
conceive of «the urban construction site as an ever - changing still
life».