According to a 2014 AMS peer - reviewed paper, 92 % of U.S. farmers and 81 % of Master's degree (at least) agronomists reject
the concept of anthropogenic global warming.
Until somebody comes up with proof that CO2 «traps heat energy»
the concept of anthropogenic global warming is just another crackpot idea.
Not exact matches
The politicians who promote the
concept of «Catastrophic
Anthropogenic Global Warming» have also promoted the following measures:
FYI, this paper is already being widely cited on blogs by
global warming deniers as proof that all
of the climate models are wrong, wrong, wrong and that the whole
concept of anthropogenic GHG - caused
warming has been refuted.
You further presume that it is essential to «mitigate» climate change which by default castigates as «denier» all who accept your
anthropogenic majority
global warming, yet who find the economics
of «mitigation» incredibly bad and the
concept morally reprehensible.
the Donald Trump organization, though they, too, do not agree with the IPCC and COP25
concept of an
anthropogenic (CO2)
global warming.
He includes quotes from those who support and endorse the
concepts of catastrophic
anthropogenic global warming (man - made, not Mann - made) and those who do not... Each section is itself a neatly packaged essay.
For decades, the mainstream journalists have dutifully reported hysterical alarmism generated by a minority
of scientists dedicated to the
concept of human CO2 - caused catastrophic
anthropogenic global warming (CAGW)... this style
of sensationalist, tabloid «climate science» journalism however is dependent on either a condition
of stuck - on - stupid mentality or a highly biased, politically motivated political agenda, not on scientific empirical evidence
Sure, we're all familiar with the
concept of «peak oil,» its contribution to
anthropogenic global warming and fuel alternatives, but what about its history?