(In fact, co-author Michael Mann is the same scientist whose controversial «hockey - stick» graph first ignited widespread public
concern over global warming in the early 2000s.)
Not exact matches
The main
concerns over Tillerson's nomination focus on his close relationship with Putin — he received the Order of Friendship from Russia
in 2013 — and his long career
in an industry that carries heavy responsibility for
global warming.
Long, carefully thought out, and articulate discussions such as those found on Real Climate, Rabbett Run and Open Mind have allowed me to remain confident
in the scientific basis of
concerns over global warming and ocean acidification (well sometimes Eli mystifies me).
Importantly, Gallup's annual March update on the environment shows a drop
in public
concern about
global warming across several different measures, suggesting that the
global warming message may have lost some footing with Americans
over the past year.
Our letter that appeared
in the February 14th issue of Science Magazine was motivated by our
concerns about the widespread news reports, opinion pieces, and blog postings linking this winter's cold weather
over the central and eastern U.S. to
global warming.
We have compiled a list of
over 100 respected scientists
in climatology and related fields who do NOT believe that the facts are clear and that the science
concerning global warming is settled.
The proportion of Americans
in the «alarmed» segment increased by five percentage points
over the past year, and is now comparable to proportion found
in the fall of 2008, when the segments were first identified and
global warming concern was at a high point nationally.
The post starts off wondering if there may have been a recent decline
in public
concern over global warming and then considers if a simpler method of communicating the science would help.
The problem with that statement
in this textbook is that these authors misuse it to argue that environmental policies based on
concerns over global warming are not even worthy of support.
The individual I speak of here is self - described «
concerned citizen» Dave Rado, the person I've detailed
over the past 4 blog posts as being someone beset with problems surrounding the official complaint he filed
in 2007
over the UK Channel Four Television Corporation video «The Great
Global Warming Swindle.»
I find
concerned liberals are loath to talk about how consistently wrong climate models have been or about the «pause»
in global warming that has gone on for
over fifteen years, while climate skeptics avoid discussion of things like ocean acidification and accelerated melting
in Greenland and the Arctic.
PRINCETON, NJ — The slight upward trend
in Americans»
concern about
global warming over the past decade masks a more significant trend: the growing gap between Republicans and Democrats
over global warming.
In the past few months, climate scientists speaking out about the dangers of
global warming have come under increased assault, largely because of climate skeptics voicing
concerns over the information contained within certain scientists» email messages.
Skeptics, write Hoffman, think
concern over global warming just a ruse to curtail personal liberties — by increasing the power of government to interfere
in the market.
I don't tend to write much about this, but my
concern over global warming is based, to a great extent, on the losses
in biodiversity that will inevitably result from climate change, even at rates that don't greatly damage human economic activity
in general.
However, I admit I do not understand why he was opposed to handing the information
over to Keenan as he has no axe to grind as far as temperature is
concerned or
global warming (which is something that came very late
in his career and was probably of little interest to him).
Nothing,
in other words, like the
concern over global warming.
In the past several years, there has been a growing
concern over the effect of
global warming on the climate.
Over the next few critical months, he would play a major role, sometimes
in the background,
in a dazzling number of crucial events that would finally put
global warming back
in its rightful place at the forefront of public
concern.
(1) there is established scientific
concern over warming of the climate system based upon evidence from observations of increases
in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising
global average sea level;
As for skeptics who
concern themselves with the «pause
in global warming», it is baffling to me how anybody would think a bit of cooling,
warming or «pausing»
over two or even ten decades can indicate very much at all.
Fewer than one - third of Americans lose sleep
over global warming, fewer than express
concern over air pollution, fewer than get stressed
over environmental issues that haven't dominated the news
in decades, such as the extinction of plants and animals and the loss of tropical rain forests.
Despite
concerns over global warming, scientists have discovered something that may have actually limited the impact of greenhouse gases
in the atmosphere
in recent years by reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the surface of the Earth.
Even more
concerning is that the extraction, distribution, and combustion of natural gas result
in the leakage of methane, a powerful
global warming gas 34 times stronger than carbon dioxide at trapping heat
over a 100 - year period.
In this «Connolley Problem» series of posts, I've already pointed out suspect detail omissions (parts 1 and 2) and the suspect time span (part 3), of a supposed
concerned citizen's official complaint
over a 2007 UK
global warming video featuring skeptic climate scientists.
The president of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a free - market think tank based
in Washington, has derided
concern over global warming.
This ocean acidification hypothesis, as it has come to be known, has gained great momentum
in recent years, because it offers a second independent reason to regulate fossil fuel emissions
in addition to that provided by
concerns over traditional
global warming.
(1) Because of a growing
concern over the possible consequences of
global warming, which may be caused
in part by increases
in atmospheric carbon dioxide (a major greenhouse gas), and also because of the need for accurate estimates of carbon dioxide emissions, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) has developed factors for estimating the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of U.S. coal consumption.