The bit in my A.T. piece was how Robert McClure (a Society of Environmental Journalists board member who had previously offered me the unsupported idea that Gelbspan's work was also documented by others) quoted Dykstra's
concern over skeptic climate scientist Patrick Michaels getting too much «false» media balance.
Not exact matches
And while early results have been promising, some
skeptics have held out on the hype due to
concerns over side effects and whether results will persist in later - stage trials.
Oakland's charter movement can be traced to 2003, when the state took
over the financially troubled district and
concerned parents clamored for more choices for their children, according to Gary Yee, a self - described charter
skeptic and a former school board member who was interim superintendent before Antwan Wilson took
over as superintendent.
I find
concerned liberals are loath to talk about how consistently wrong climate models have been or about the «pause» in global warming that has gone on for
over fifteen years, while climate
skeptics avoid discussion of things like ocean acidification and accelerated melting in Greenland and the Arctic.
There is «vanishing public
concern over «dangerous man - made climate change» and growing discontent with the politicized rear guard's increasingly desperate search for new scare words and its bigoted hate speech hurled at
skeptics («deniers,» evoking the Holocaust),» he wrote in 2014.
Makes you wonder if any of the «
skeptics» were similarly
concerned over other lengthy periods when the observed warming was greater than the model projections.
In the past few months, climate scientists speaking out about the dangers of global warming have come under increased assault, largely because of climate
skeptics voicing
concerns over the information contained within certain scientists» email messages.
Skeptics, write Hoffman, think
concern over global warming just a ruse to curtail personal liberties — by increasing the power of government to interfere in the market.
As for
skeptics who
concern themselves with the «pause in global warming», it is baffling to me how anybody would think a bit of cooling, warming or «pausing»
over two or even ten decades can indicate very much at all.
The biggest shock from reading the emails was that the IPCC assessment process had a substantial element of schoolyard bullies, trying to insulate their shoddy science from outside scrutiny and attacks by
skeptics,
over concern with their press and media attention, discrediting
skeptics, etc..
In this «Connolley Problem» series of posts, I've already pointed out suspect detail omissions (parts 1 and 2) and the suspect time span (part 3), of a supposed
concerned citizen's official complaint
over a 2007 UK global warming video featuring
skeptic climate scientists.
Here's my
concern over the specific accusation narrative that
skeptics were on the payroll of the fossil fuel industry — as I implied in both my March 17, 2014 blog post and my post just three weeks ago, there really has only been one solitary bit of core evidence keeping this accusation alive the whole time.
Pick any comment thread
over the years of your blog, and no doubt you'll find a high % where
concern is expressed by «
skeptics» asserting a direct link between the source of funding and bias in the work of climate scientists.