Not exact matches
Rather
than meet in a pub, per longstanding Irish tradition, the two men laced up their sneakers and went for a run, a picture of youthful energy as they discussed shared
concerns about
climate change, NATO, and Europe.
While regional differences reveal a mix of threats that
concern CEOs, they share a common increasing worry about broader societal developments — geopolitical uncertainty, terrorism, and
climate change — rather
than direct business risks such as
changing consumer behaviour or new market entrants.
As long as financial and energy giants are more
concerned about stranded assets
than they are about
climate change, what chance really do we have?
However, the current federal administration has shown more
concern for the oil and gas industry's bottom line
than for
climate change.
I'd like to think we did it because we didn't want to press our luck anymore, because repairs cost more
than the Blue Book said you were worth, because you didn't have anti-lock brakes or passenger - side airbags, because we really couldn't have you breaking down on a late - night drive home from the airport or on a busy interstate, because of fuel economy and our deepening
concern over
climate change.
Rainforest Alliance President Nigel Sizer, a tropical forest ecologist, explains the complex relationship between rainforests and
climate change — and why it is more important
than ever that those who are
concerned make their voices heard.
Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his
concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply
changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental
change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future
than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic
climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!
Oil sands extraction raises
concerns among environmentalists because it generates more of the heat - trapping gases causing
climate change than conventional oil drilling, among other things
«Given the
concerns about our own environment and
climate change, finding an exoplanet that might experience the runaway greenhouse much sooner
than we will made us reflect on the Earth's near - and long - term prospects for habitability,» Jenkins says.
U.S. Catholics, mainline Protestants and Evangelicals are all more
concerned about
climate change now
than before the pope's encyclical was published.
Arguing against mitigation by appealing to uncertainty is therefore misplaced: any appeal to uncertainty should provoke a greater, rather
than weaker,
concern about
climate change than in the absence of uncertainty.
THE substance at the heart of worldwide
concerns about
climate change is more beautiful
than most people realise.
No one is more
concerned than the Japanese, who are surrounded by seas; about 73 % of Japan is forested, mountainous, and unsuitable for agricultural, industrial, or residential use, as a result, the habitable zones are mainly located in or near coastal areas, so much so that, there are growing
concerns in Japan of the impact of
climate change on their coastal surroundings, prompting the Japanese government to set up an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to undertake a study on climate change, to provide future projections of coastal erosion based on representative concentration pathway (RCP) sce
climate change on their coastal surroundings, prompting the Japanese government to set up an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to undertake a study on climate change, to provide future projections of coastal erosion based on representative concentration pathway (RCP) scen
change on their coastal surroundings, prompting the Japanese government to set up an Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) to undertake a study on climate change, to provide future projections of coastal erosion based on representative concentration pathway (RCP) sce
Climate Change (IPCC) to undertake a study on climate change, to provide future projections of coastal erosion based on representative concentration pathway (RCP) scen
Change (IPCC) to undertake a study on
climate change, to provide future projections of coastal erosion based on representative concentration pathway (RCP) sce
climate change, to provide future projections of coastal erosion based on representative concentration pathway (RCP) scen
change, to provide future projections of coastal erosion based on representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios.
Although not generally stressed about
climate change, those with high levels of altruistic
concern, or
concern for the well - being of others, also engaged in some environmental coping strategies and pro-environmental behaviors — more so
than those whose environmental
concerns were mostly egoistic.
However, there's a whole army of other factors that we need to be more
concerned about
than scientific collecting — including habitat loss, pathogens, human activities and
climate change.
My only
concern with climatedebatedaily is that no attempt is made to differentiate peer reviewed science from a wide range of opinion pieces, leaving the reader with the impression that mainstream science is far less resolved on the
climate change issue
than is actually the case.
«We may notice more hurricanes and heat waves
than usual and become
concerned about
climate change, but we don't always know the best ways to reduce our emissions,» Lacasse said.
What I tried to do in Forecast is show how traditionally environmental
concerns, in this case
climate change, are really about much more
than «the environment.»
Global
climate change appears to be an example where a dissociation between the output of the analytic and the affective system results in less
concern than is advisable, with analytic consideration suggesting to most people that global warming is a serious
concern, but the affective system failing to send an early warning signal (Weber, 2006).
The probe by this team takes the timeline on Exxon's focus on
climate change several years earlier
than a previous investigation of oil industry assessments of global warming by the Union of
Concerned Scientists.
Why is CO2 more important
than, say, deforestation or forest fires (as a «plant removal», not CO2 producer) as far as
climate changes are
concerned?
I suspect that virtually all farmers in Africa and Asia are more
concerned with
climate change over the next 40 years
than with those after 2050.
Wigley made a controversial but I think correct point a few years back that if the real
concern of Kyoto and IPCC is the really severe
climate change at the end of the century, the cutting emissions now will have less effect on that
than cutting emissions closer to that time.
Consider that combating
climate change requires nothing less
than a radical restructuring of how the world makes and uses energy, and consider the overwhelming level of public
concern it would take to impose such sweeping
changes on the vested interests profiting by the status quo (and let's be honest... to impose such
changes on a public comfortable with the status quo).
It would be hard to find someone more
concerned about human - driven
climate change and more involved in pursuing and assessing ways to get traction on curbing greenhouse gas emissions
than Marshall.
Apparently, the survey reveals that dog mess is of more
concern to the public
than climate change.
Dan H.'s promoting a notion unrelated to Kahan's study; Kahan did not compare rational to emotional approaches (nor anything to that effect — Dan H. appears to suggest
concern (about
climate change) is emotional rather
than rational.
Interestingly, Bartlett appears more
concerned by our vulnerability to terrorist attacks and foreign aggression through electromagnetic pulse weapons (EMPs)
than he is worried about
climate change, but the end result of that
concern is still a belief in resilience and responsibility.
«
Concerns about
climate change and energy security are driving an aggressive expansion of bioenergy crop production and many of these plant species emit more isoprene
than the traditional crops they are replacing,» the paper states.
But for detecting
climate change, the
concern is not the absolute temperature — whether a station is reading warmer or cooler
than a nearby station over grass — but how that temperature
changes over time.
A 2014 study found that Christians, particularly white Christians, are less
concerned with
climate change than the nation's general population.
Despite satellite estimates that more
than doubled the population of known Emperor Penguins, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
changed their ranking of Emperors from a species of Least
Concern to a Near - Threatened species based on modeling studies blaming the decline of DuDu's penguins on
climate change as presented in Jenouvrier and Caswell's study.
While forecasting the state of the environment more
than 80 years into the future is a notoriously inexact exercise, academics gathered by the the United Nations at the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change are
concerned the world is headed for «extensive» species extinctions, serious crop damage and irreversible increases in sea levels even before Trump started to unpick the fight against global warming.
A new study just released by the Union of
Concerned Scientists shows that of the three major cable news networks, in 2013 Fox News far and away was the worst at covering news about
climate change: More
than 70 percent of their coverage contained misleading statements about it.
This latest report on the Science of
Climate Change covered the key aspects of
concern to those not part of the IPCC consensus, but did not involve them sufficiently, if at all, in developing the material and the result seems to be an official dismissal of the literature rather
than a thorough development as is common for ideas necessary for the consensus view to be valid.
Rud, when I talk to those of the Progressive Left who are most
concerned about
climate change, and who want the United States to become the leader in finding ways to reduce carbon emissions, they pretty much go silent when I inform them that the EPA has legal authority under the Clean Air Act and the 2009 Endangerment Finding to do much more in placing limits on carbon emissions
than the agency is actually doing.
The people of Earth need fresh water and we all need to be more
concerned about having more of it, even it takes more energy to make it or having to listen to the fearmongering of Leftist opinion - makers like Obama and Kerry who claim respectively that, «no challenge — poses a greater threat to future generations
than climate change,» and, that global warming is, «perhaps the world's most fearsome weapon of mass destruction.»
He argued that, while these other
concerns might well deserve analysis, there are reasons to think that the non-
climate catastrophes referenced by the authors of the Cato paper are of a different magnitude and nature
than those posed by
climate change and thus, not directly comparable.
None of the funds made available to the Environmental Protection Agency by this division or any other Act may be expended for purposes of enforcing or promulgating any regulation (other
than with respect to section 202 of the Clean Air Act) or order, taking action relating to, or denying approval of state implementation plans or permits because of the emissions of greenhouse gases due to
concerns regarding possible
climate change.
«Claims the malaria resurgence is due to
climate change ignore these realities and disregard history... Public
concern should focus on ways to deal with the realities of malaria transmission, rather
than on the weather.»
She seems to have no
concern for anything (such as the future of the planet with
climate change damage or the huge environmental and health problems caused by the coal industry) other
than getting her way;
The «hack» posting at The Air Vent may have had a special twist, as the subject there was about «An open letter reply to a letter written to government by 18 different scientific organizations
concerning climate change legislation» that criticizes the associations about
climate terminology: «Dear President or Executive Director, How could it happen that more
than a dozen of the most prestigious scientific associations signed and submitted this letter on «
climate change» without having ensured that the used terminology is sufficiently defined.
It
concerns the thorny issue of right - wing political values and
climate change, but rather
than discuss the politics, I am interested in possible solutions to GHG mitigation that don't offend the political Right.
This API document demonstrates that some participants in the
climate change disinformation machine were more interested in framing
climate change as uncertain
than they were in educating citizens about the scientific basis for
concern.
Those of us involved in that research are motivated entirely by
concern over the suffering of humans and non-humans alike due to
climate change, and we think there is sufficient cause for alarm about the future to do the research into the idea of putting something like sulfate (not a significant part of aircraft exhaust) into the stratosphere (higher
than the airplanes you see making contrails).
Finally, I don't see why if I'm
concerned with making investment decisions in the face of uncertainty I should be spending so much more effort on
climate change than the possibility of nuclear war, mass - casualty terrorism, supervolcanos, or mega-earthquakes.
«Everywhere I travel as secretary of state — in every meeting, here at home and across the more
than 100,000 miles I've traveled since I raised my hand and took the oath to serve in this office — I raise the
concern of
climate change,» he wrote just last week in an opinion piece in Grist.
It could have led to a different approach to evolving the discourse between scientists and users of information — a freer relationship and one less constrained
than is the current process by political gatekeepers
concerned with controlling the flow of communications about
climate change and its implications for the United States.
While
climate change is the greatest threat, there are many other threats that, if we do not reverse them, could cause the collapse of our present global civilisation; yet far more people are
concerned with beliefs that are entirely without evidentiary support
than are trying to move the World toward sustainability.
Polling shows that nonwhites in the U.S. are more
concerned about
climate change than whites and more likely to say they feel its impacts.