But, now, those lawmakers are
concerned about standardized test results that put it among the worst schools in the state.
Instead, the crowd broke into smaller discussion groups to identify
concerns about standardized testing.
State legislators Michael Kearns, Ray Walter and Marc Panepinto shared
their concerns about standardized tests during a Monday rally.
Jane Baton, who identified herself as a local algebra teacher, said she was
concerned about standardized testing when it came to students» math aptitude, and said rigidity in the system is not good for students.
She claims that with all
the concern about standardized tests at the end of the year, many teachers forget that students need to know what they are working towards.
In essence, it is important that parents continue to advocate and voice
concerns about standardized testing, however, alternative supports need to be in place for students and parents as standardized testing are now the norm.
An article in the Sunday Review highlights some of
the concerns about standardized tests raised by minority parents, students, and educators.
The Test: Why Our Schools are Obsessed with Standardized Testing — But You Don't Have to Be by Anya Kamenetz Nice summary of
concerns about standardized testing and arguments against it.
Not exact matches
Wuthnow is most
concerned about how the hegemony of government standards eventually erodes the freedom and particularity of congregations — just as
standardized tests have eroded the freedom and particularity of schools.
Test results for third - through eighth - graders across New York state improved this year even amid
concerns about the length of the
standardized exams and reports of erroneous questions, according to data released by the state Education Department.
Flanagan said his colleagues «have a deep and abiding
concern»
about Cuomo's original proposal for amending the evaluation system, which would have increased the ratings» reliance on
standardized testing to 50 percent.
Meanwhile, a broader backlash against reform, fueled by
concerns about over-reliance on
standardized tests, the accuracy of new evaluations, and the efficacy of performance - based incentives, has led some states to reverse course.
I share the
concerns raised by many of my friends at the Coalition of Essential Schools that
standardized tests do not
test many of the things we care
about.
But
testing opposition appears to be more closely linked to
concerns about teacher evaluation policies: the top two reasons chosen among a national survey of parents who opted out were, «I oppose using students» performance on
standardized tests to evaluate teachers» and «
standardized tests force teachers to teach to the
test.»
Recently
concerns have also been raised
about the amount of time students now spend taking
standardized tests.
Despite their rhetoric expressing
concern about the role that
standardized tests play in our education system, politicians persist in valuing these
tests almost exclusively when it comes to accountability — not only for schools, as has been the case since the inception of No Child Left Behind, but for teachers as well, with a national push to include the results of these
tests in teacher evaluations.
«There were various anecdotal reasons why students refused the
test, ranging from
test anxiety to
concerns about this specific
standardized assessment,» she said.
Tell them why you are
concerned about the excessive
testing and demand transparency for the
standardized tests that our state's legislature and department of education require our students to take.
State accountability systems focus attention and resources on low performance and remediation, but in many school districts across the country district leaders are as much
concerned, if not more,
about sustaining good performance and
about establishing agendas for student learning beyond proficiency scores on
standardized tests.
Adkins addresses several frequent criticisms of the
test, including objections to using a corporate partner to score the assessments and
concerns about the effort to
standardize the teaching profession.
Getz, who was one of 50 principals who signed a letter to New York Education Commission John King citing
concerns about the quality of the spring 2013 assessments, hopes policymakers will acknowledge that
standardized test scores are imperfect measures of what students are supposed to learn under the new standards.
Distilling critics» fears to the common denominator, one finds an overarching
concern that the current discussion
about IPS reform will center on shifting control of money and power without genuine awareness of what techniques could best shape IPS students into life - long learners capable of achieving success on a broader plane than that defined by
standardized test scores.
Rutherford County Board of Education member Lisa Moore and Holloway High School math teacher Monica White talk
about their
concerns for the TNReady
standardized tests students take on computers.
Unfortunately,
standardized tests may not accurately or completely measure what is actually taking place in schools or what the public is most
concerned about (i.e., the public interest).
Keith Harrison, a 9th grade English teacher from Baldwin High School in suburban Pittsburgh, said he told Duncan that teachers are
concerned about schemes that use
standardized test scores to evaluate teachers.
If you are
concerned about the harmful consequences of
standardized tests, please sign the National Resolution on High - Stakes
Testing at http://timeoutfromtesting.org/nationalresolution.
But the teachers expressed
concern about how their principals could handle more time in classrooms and that
standardized tests would be overused.
Parents Across America is especially
concerned about the use of federal power in the nationwide push to expand
standardized testing.
In the last month we've raised serious
concerns about the lack of emergency preparedness at many campuses, provided the school district with an application process to pilot restorative practices in our schools, and called on district leaders to expand SAISD's simplistic conception of student success and measure our students in ways that do justice to their social and emotional needs — something absent from SAISD's endless focus on
standardized test data.
Each year educators raise
concerns about the limitations of
standardized testing and the downside of «teaching to the
test» while policymakers and commentators discuss and pontificate
about the «shockingly poor results.»
Although value - added is one of the more advanced statistical approaches, researchers have raised
concerns about its reliability, as well as potential unintended consequences, such as demoralizing teachers and placing greater emphasis on
standardized tests.
Something I talk
about in my first book is something that
concerns me — especially with
standardized assessments — is that we try to boil schools, students, teachers down to one
test result.
Concerns about whether students have to take too many
standardized tests have been raised for years.
The article also provides two sections with related information: 1) a «glossary of
testing terms,» which explains fundamentals of
standardized tests and how these
tests will be used in the context of new federal legislation (the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002) which requires states to give
standardized tests annually, analyze data in specific ways, and track progress toward a required goal; and 2) «frequently asked questions
about standardized testing,» which addresses many of parents»
concerns about how
standardized tests may be used with and affect their children.
CEA Executive Director Mary Loftus Levine, parents, and teachers told members of the State Board of Education today that they are
concerned about the potential overreliance on
standardized test scores in teacher evaluations.
In response to the growing public
concern about the Common Core, the Common Core Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC)
testing scheme, and the inappropriate and unfair use of
standardized test scores when evaluating Connecticut's public school teachers, a growing number of state representatives and state senators are stepping forward and introducing legislation that would stop, or at least slow down, the damaging Corporate Education Reform Industry's agenda that is undermining public education in Connecticut.
Newkirk also has
concerns about the connection between
standardized testing and the Common Core, a situation that ultimately limits what is taught: «These
tests will give operational reality to the standards — in effect they will become the standards; there will be little incentive to teach to skills that are not
tested.»
However, because
standardized testing is a matter of public
concern, a local speaking as a union, or an individual member speaking as a parent or citizen,
about educational
concerns over
standardized testing, for instance, in a letter to the editor or in a statement to the Board of Education, is protected by the U.S. Constitution at least so long as they are not encouraging other parents or students to opt out from a
test.»
Here's the Friday, January 11 letter in which LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy describes his
concerns about California State Superintendent Tom Torlakson's recommendation to reduce
standardized testing: It's not that Deasy opposes all changes to the current
testing and accountability system.