My growing
concerns about science's soul have aroused some old, odd memories.
Finally, Chinese researchers at home or away face global
concerns about their science that are rooted in the country's evaluation system.
They expressed
concerns about the science behind genetic cancer predictors developed by two Duke researchers, oncologist Anil Potti and Nevins.
Over 1,000 employees signed up to receive training to be an ambassador and reach out directly to consumers to address question and
concerns about science.
But I think one of the things that scientists and other people
concerned about science education in the country need to do is make it clear to publishers that as citizens and voters, wherever they live, whatever state or town that they live [in], they will make sure that their elected officials know that textbook X, Y or Z is not to be used in this district because of its bad science.
Dr. Sylvia Porter made it clear right from the beginning that they weren't going forward: «John, we're not
concerned about your science — it's clear you are a terrific scientist.
However the new primary curriculum, inspectors found, could risk as narrowing of the curriculum — with teachers highlighting
concerns about science, foreign languages and design and technology.
As long as you don't need to be
concerned about the science or math there are an almost infinite number of ways to prove that global warming / climate change doesn't exist.
Much easier to throw stones from the outside, all the while claiming to be
concerned about the science?
I think Dwight Eisenhower was actually more
concerned about the science / government complex than the military / industrial complex, so I agree that government grant money for science just needs to disappear.
When I see people acting
concerned about the science while promoting far worse junk science themselves, I will point that out.
... you'd actually be admitting that your supposed
concerns about the science is actually supposed concerns about the perceived potential societal impact of actions to reduce AGW.
However it points to a far deeper
concern about science and scientists to me.
Certainly AGW supporters claim that academic researchers are only
concerned about the science and are not concerned about the funding incentives.
Not exact matches
The experts have stated that social
science has shown that the
concerns often raised
about children of lesbian and gay parents —
concerns that are generally grounded in prejudice against and stereotypes
about gay people — are unfounded.
The remainder of this chapter will be
concerned with three other kinds of human relations — economic, political, and familial — and with what the
sciences centrally
concerned with them tell
about human nature and its transformations.
And back then, wasn't it the fans wrapped up in «theories» who were ultimately disappointed when they found out that Lost wasn't really
concerned with answering the thousands of questions it had raised — that it was less a heady show
about theology and
science and more an emotional show
about its characters and the human experience?
When I go through David Kinnaman's research, which reflects just
about every
concern I express in my «15 Reasons» posts --(young people are leaving the church because they believe it is too exclusive, too combative with
science, hyper - political, out - of - touch when it comes to sexuality, and an unsafe place in which to wrestle with doubt)-- I am often met with blank stares.
He considers it entirely appropriate for biologists to be
concerned not only with how biological traits came
about but also with what specific organic features are for, even though most scientists and philosophers of
science place questions of purpose outside the realm of research.
It can be a social
science, for instance, most immediately
concerning things
about money, and extending to the calculus of social and cultural exchanges where notions of benefit and utility operate.
Now this soul, and what is biological in man and what
science makes its evolutionary affirmation
about, can not be regarded simply as two different things,
concerning which of course opposed statements would not raise any difficulties.
God's Revelation can in fact and in principle
concern realities which themselves are accessible to secular experience of a scientific or historical kind, so that on the one hand what Revelation states
about them is open to possible threat of an eventual at least apparently opposed discovery of secular
science and on the other hand natural
science must in principle always reckon on a possible veto on the part of theology (Cf. Denzinger 1947 ff., 2187).
The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be
concerned with how
science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should raise questions
about the meaning of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.
Thus on both the social and the individual levels the proposal of a simple transfer of the ethical attitudes of
science appears to underestimate the complexity of ethical issues, to idealize the purity of the scientist's motives, and to provide no adequate dynamic for
concern about the welfare of others.
The ethics of authorship, obligation to cite prior work, and problems of multiple authorship have been analyzed in an article in
Science.13 Others have been
concerned about the humane treatment of animals, which are crucial in experimental biology and pharmacology.
I am very
concerned about the present mental health and harm brought by backward beliefs to smother
science and education of our future generations.
Social
science has shown that the
concerns often raised
about children of lesbian and gay parents —
concerns that are generally grounded in prejudice against and stereotypes
about gay people — are unfounded.
Which is why they stated social
science has shown that the
concerns often raised
about children of lesbian and gay parents —
concerns that are generally grounded in prejudice against and stereotypes
about gay people — are unfounded.
Your prejudice and bigotry is hysterical because the experts have already stated that social
science has shown that the
concerns often raised
about children of lesbian and gay parents —
concerns that are generally grounded in prejudice against and stereotypes
about gay people — are unfounded.
Scientists have complete freedom to investigate, but decisions
about the purposes
science should serve involve essentially religious questions
concerning the meaning of life and the goals of men.
What
about that «flawed»
science that The Cornucopia Institute depended on when exposing
concerns that food - grade carrageenan poses human health risks as an inflammatory agent and possible carcinogen?
On the International Day of Women and Girls in
Science, we're talking to Marcia DeLonge, a senior scientist and agroecologist in the Food & Environment Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) about working in environmental s
Science, we're talking to Marcia DeLonge, a senior scientist and agroecologist in the Food & Environment Program at the Union of
Concerned Scientists (UCS)
about working in environmental
sciencescience.
This
concern about artificially transferring genes between kingdoms and species in a way that has never occurred naturally is now being validated by a large body of
science.
The
science that gives evidence that sometimes, for any number of reasons, there is pain and before it can be resolved there is less milk and stress and fear and even less milk and
concern and doubt
about milk from another.
And if you are
concerned about sudden infant death syndrome, see this overview of the
science of SIDS and these research - based tips for reducing the risk of SIDS.
I'm feeling pretty positive
about the whole «secondary education'thing - there are some very good text - books around, and I realise that these days most
science experiments have to be done by a teacher, for safety
concerns, so we can probably do almost everything at home - or else find something on TV or the Internet.
Furthermore, Baby Milk Action does not wish to acknowledge the lack of verifiable «
science» underlying its calls for total breastfeeding through 3 years of age, especially in Hong Kong where there are minimal
concerns about unsanitary drinking water required for use of powdered follow - on formula.
Obviously, you're trying to appear rational and pragmatic
about all this, talking
about following «the
science» while balancing economic development with environmental and public health
concerns.
Perhaps best known for advocating that the nation guard against the potential influence of the military — industrial complex, a term he is credited with coining, the speech also expressed
concerns about planning for the future and the dangers of massive spending, especially deficit spending, the prospect of the domination of
science through Federal funding and, conversely, the domination of
science - based public policy by what he called a «scientific - technological elite».
The
science and technology committee raised several
concerns about the standard of the peer - review process in scientific papers, calling for greater recognition of the work involved, which many in the scientific community consider a burden.
«The NUT welcomes the increased take up and the overall high results achieved in the
sciences and Mathematics, but continues to have grave
concerns about the declining entry for Modern Foreign Languages.
In a research paper published in April last year, Chinese scientists described how they were able to manipulate the genomes of human embryos for the first time, which raised ethical
concerns about the new frontier in
science.
Following her strongly - worded annual report, the governement's forensic
science regulator, Gill Tully, raised further
concerns about the state of the forensic
science in an evidence session held by the
science and technology select committee this morning.
New Yorkers deserve answers, and we strongly encourage Governor Cuomo and his staff to do the right thing: be forthright with the public
about the
science being reviewed, let the outside experts reviewing his administration's work speak openly
about their ideas, suggestions, and
concerns, and open their work to public comment.
Shadow Business Secretary Chuka Umunna told the BBC: «What we heard at the hearing today reinforces the grave
concerns we have
about this deal and confirms many of the worst fears of people in the business and
science community in the UK.
In accordance with public policy being
concerned about the well - being of its citizens,
science policy's goal is to consider how
science and technology can best serve the public.
Realizing that
science may not be the driving factor in decision - making, and recognizing the other issues people are
concerned about can also help scientists frame information to better appeal to a particular audience.
While the Senate's counterpart bill has not yet emerged from the subcommittee that funds NASA, Sen. Richard Shelby, R - Ala., chairman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice,
Science and Related Agencies, raised
concerns about spending cuts included in the White House budget blueprint.
«I've never seen the scientific community so
concerned about making sure that the process of
science works, and it's not a self - serving
concern,» agreed AAAS President Barbara Schaal at the press briefing.
Federal funding of
science and technology may fall short of what is needed to keep the U.S. research enterprise competitive, said AAAS CEO Rush Holt, but he also increasingly hears «
concerns about what I would call an ongoing trend that goes back many years, even decades, where ideology and ideological assertions have been crowding out evidence in public and private debates and policymaking.»