This affirmation came directly from one of the Big Six publishers that has been criticized for its business practices
concerning ebook lending of its titles.
Not exact matches
By demonstrating how
ebook lending can work through this site, he hopes that publishers and libraries can put to rest some of the
concerns that both sides have on the issue.
The British government had formed a task force earlier this year to investigate the potential impact of
ebook lending in order to consider mandating
lending; the task force was made up of voices from various sectors in the book industry, but the news led to
concerns that libraries would possibly suffer in an era of all - digital
lending adoption.
The publishers who are currently not participating in the library
ebook market all seem to be worrying about the lack of «friction» in the library
ebook lending transaction as far as the patrons are
concerned.
Since publishers are so
concerned with the «perpetuity of
lending and simultaneity of availability» of their
ebooks, I have to wonder if libraries shouldn't just help them out and hit the STOP button themselves?
The company is citing «security
concerns ``, much in the same way that Harper Collins cited the «need to protect their authors» when they imposed the 26 - circulation cap on library
ebook lending back in February 2011.
Addressing these
concerns will require OverDrive and our library partners to cooperate to honor geographic and territorial rights for digital book
lending, as well as to review and audit policies regarding an
eBook borrower's relationship to the library (i.e. customer lives, works, attends school in service area, etc.).
There were even
concerns that the ALA Midwinter conference might see some organized and heated protests by members in the exhibit hall where these publishers have set up booths, but several spoke about the futility of letting feelings over
eBook lending become hostile.
But that might be changing where
ebooks are
concerned, and it has publishers watching the state of
lending very carefully.
OverDrive, which provides a full catalog of
ebooks for public and school libraries to
lend their patrons to over 15,000 libraries, was stunned this week when Penguin Group demanded that all of their titles be pulled from OverDrive's catalog, claiming that it had «security
concerns.»
New
concerns are growing among UK publishers over the fair compensation for their authors when it comes to library
lending, specifically of
ebooks.
Admittedly, Raphael had some good things to say about how the publishers are at least willing to listen to the
concerns coming from the public libraries and are even interested in continuing the dialog to resolve their own
concerns, fears that Raphael even says are not just lip service or an effort to not cooperate with
ebook lending.
Publishers and authors are right to be
concerned about the impact of
lending on
ebook sales.
When Penguin announced last week that it was disabling library
ebook lending on the Kindle and pulling its latest
ebook titles from all library
lending platforms, libraries and readers took the hit, but to some observers they were collateral damage in a fight between publishers and Amazon about the control of publishers» titles... Indeed, Penguin's move suggests that the publishing industry's long - simmering
concern over Amazon's dominant position and its aggressive new ventures in the
ebook market are coming to a boil.
While I understand Amazon's
concerns with other
ebook lending programs, I think KU must be having as drastic of an impact on their sales revenues as it is on many authors.
The importance of DRM mainly stems from the fact that most publishers do not allow their
eBooks to be distributed (sold or
lent) without DRM due to piracy and control
concerns.
But
eBook lending by libraries does not naturally hew to patron - district boundaries and has become an area of
concern for publishers.
Adler speaks to the often cited issue of publishers fearing piracy as a result of
ebook lending, a
concern pooh - poohed as a sham issue by many critics of publishers on this matter.
In its November decision to not allow library
lending of its new titles (via any vendor), Penguin had initially also targeted OverDrive's relationship with Amazon as a particular
concern, which led the company to demand that OverDrive disable the «Get for Kindle» functionality for all Penguin
ebooks.