Sentences with phrase «concerning faith and reason»

And in keeping with this magazine's prescription concerning Faith and Reason we review a biography of Blessed Duns Scotus, the Franciscan theologian and mystic who so eloquently expounded Catholic belief in Christ as the cornerstone of Creation.
One of the more subtle forms, yet for all that resilient and influential, of the Catholic disjunction concerning faith and reason is present in otherwise fecund thinkers.

Not exact matches

• Last year, Muslim scholar, Ali Nayed and Italian philosopher and theologian, Alessandro Martinetti took part in a scholarly written discussion concerning Pope Benedict's Regensburg affirmation that we should expect God (the Logos) to act profoundly rationally, and hence for there to a profound harmony of Faith and reason.
Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, as well as Pope St John Paul II, was very concerned with what the secular world sees as the opposition between faith and reason, but which the Church sees as its two wings.
In a Guardian article on November 3rd the prominent Islamic scholar Tariq Ramadan wrote concerning the «debate between faith and reason, and over the virtues of rationalism»: «The Pope's remarks at Regensburg have opened up new areas of inquiry that must be explored and exploited in a positive way, with a view to building bridges and, working hand in hand, to seeking a common response to the social, cultural and economic challenges of our day.»
Humans Discover Before Presuming From the standpoint of the proposal of a new synthesis which is core to the aims and ideals of the Faith movement, we wish to draw attention to one problem in the philosophy of science which we believe needs to be clarified if the key Papal appeal concerning the «broadening of reason» is to come to fruition.
They were all concerned with the same issues, notably reason and revelation, faith and history, issues of methodology and, especially, epistemology: how can we know God?
The present collection of essays confirms his importance, for it brings his considerable breadth and depth of knowledge and wisdom to questions concerning reason, faith, God, and the soul.
If the later legislation thus modifies and narrows the covenant faith, at the same time and for the same reasons it adds to the concept a new dimension and suggests again that legalism's silence on social issues is by no means indifference but rather a sober and deeply concerned pessimism.
Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz
What's funny is Sega is concerned the game won't be profitable in the west.But if they had actually released it in the NA / EU regions it would have.Sega listen you guys have fucked yourselves big time.Not giving info to your fans in the west.Ignoring pleas for even some tidbits by game journalist.Focusing on garbage sonic games that no one really wants.These are some of the reasons you probably will not be profitable in the west with pso2.The interest in this game outside of Japan and the handful of western fans is all but non existent.A decent f2p mmo will make money in the west.Instead you are screwing yourselves out of profit to be made in the west.In the year + you were silent many many f2p titles have been released.Some being actually good.So now there is a lot of competition and still no western release.By next year it will be more.I was excited for this game but I wont download the jp version.And honestly if you released the game in NA, I'll most likely just pass on it now.I was once a fan of the pso franchise.Now I have given up on it and lost any faith in you sega as a company.
The reasons he should not have won this prize have nothing to do with his talents but concern the identity of the prize itself and our faith in its value.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z