Not exact matches
But Christ is more
concerned for our hearts and to
live for the things that are
eternal.
However, I do understand the
concern of the professor that the conversation extend beyond the person's family into the subject of salvation and
eternal life.
My main
concern is that many people get baptized because they think they are supposed to, or that it will make God happy, or that it is necessary to get baptized to receive
eternal life.
Instead, John is
concerned that these genuine believers to whom he is writing — who already have been regenerated, who already have
eternal life, and who are already born of God — will abide and remain in that position of being born of God, so that their righteousness, fellowship, and faith will grow and increase daily.
Yet through all these diversities of phrasing — whether faith was thought of as a power - releasing confidence in God, or as selfcommitment to Christ that brought the divine Spirit into indwelling control of one's
life, or as the power by which we apprehend the
eternal and invisible even while
living in the world of sense, or as the climactic vision of Christ as the Son of God which crowns our surrender to his attractiveness, or as assured conviction
concerning great truths that underlie and constitute the gospel — always the enlargement and enrichment of faith was opening new meanings in the experience of fellowship with God and was influencing deeply both the idea and the practice of prayer.
Usually, even a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and other elements of the world... Now it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an unbeliever to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics... How are they going to believe these books in matters
concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of
eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven?
In the end, Paul's message in the first half of his letter to the Romans points to one single truth: Because God has done everything necessary as far as our
eternal life is
concerned, there is absolutely nothing we (or anyone or anything else) can do to lose our
eternal life once we have it.
Christians just have a lttle extra insurance
concerning eternal life.
Is it possible that the reason that the Corinthians were so
concerned about baptism is that they had been taught by the Apostle Paul and other Christian evangelists that salvation and the promise of the resurrection of the dead and
eternal life are received in Baptism, just as orthodox Christians, including Lutherans, have been teaching for almost 2,000 years??
While I am in sympathy with your plight and suffering you endured while traveling in the Middle East, if you are truly a present Christian you should be a follower of Christ's words and
life and be
concerned for men who face
eternal damnation as Jesus taught.
You and I know that as far as
eternal life is
concerned, even if we're faithless and morally asleep (2 Tim 2:13 and 1 Thess 5:6,10), we'll
live with Him.
Such is the background of this story, and it is an interesting insight into the state of Jewish thought at this time
concerning eternal life and final judgment.
The good news in Scripture is that God has done everything that needs doing as far as your
eternal life is
concerned.
You need to understand the fact that the fear of having committed the unpardonable sin is the manifestation of your
concern about your salvation, about your
eternal security, about
eternal life.
It deals with Christology and the doctrine of God, as well as prayer, the resurrection, heaven, etc. and it provides a general introduction to Whitehead's thought.128 The Task of Philosophical Theology by C. J. Curtis, a Lutheran theologian, is a process exposition of numerous «theological notions» important to the «conservative, traditional» Christian viewpoint.129 Two very fine semi-popular introductions to process philosophy as a context for Christian theology are The Creative Advance by E. H. Peters130 and Process Thought and Christian Faith by Norman Pittenger.131 The latter, reflecting the
concerns of a theologian, provides a concise introduction to the process view of God together with briefer comments on man, Christ, and «
eternal life.»
For
eternal life does not mean the endless prolongation of a conscious self but a
life of such quality that, having no further
concern for self - interest, can transcend death and rise to a fresh mode of manifestation in the
lives of men who follow.
I also point out how while the gospel does promise
eternal life, that
life begins here and now, and the vast majority of the gospel is
concerned with how we
live our
life now.
While the details of our
eternal life with our glorified body, with each other, and with God are necessarily sketchy at best, it is clear that some thought has been given to Bernard Williams»
concern for boredom.
For the Christians, the point of human
life is not to understand what is
eternal or to learn how to die or to free oneself from
concern for personal being.
Though it contains great, tender words about
life after death, its primary
concern is not eschatology but
eternal life through Christ in the present.
In other words, the text I am referring to in that post
concerns people who apparently have already believed in Jesus for
eternal life, but have some doubts about the rest of His claims.
The third scenario would seem to be where the two tendencies continue, each on its own path, in a dynamic but notnecessarily destructive tension, with secular rationalists seeking to discredit the motives and actions of the Church leadership in the post-Vatican II era, while those who affirm a hermeneutic of continuity urge that the Good News be understood as primarily
concerned with
eternal life rather than secular interests.
Recall the opening words of the First Epistle of John: «We declare to you what was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked at and touched with our hands,
concerning the word of
life» this
life was revealed, and we have seen it and testify to it, and declare to you the
eternal life that was with the Father and was revealed to us...» First John states the primal truth that Christian faith rests on witness to what has happened in history, hence the honored place of the martyrs (witnesses) in Christian memory.
There is also a good discussion
concerning the relationship between present acts and the act of dying itself, and between time and
eternal life.
Concern with material continuity also fed theological and artistic speculation about the fate of cut fingernails and hair, the condition and presence of genitals, the age and stature of the resurrected body, the bodies of the saints, the fate of relics, whether bodies in hell are reassembled as completely as those given
eternal life and how and whether digested body parts are regurgitated at the resurrection.
They all worshiped very powerful beings — that, after all, is what gods and goddesses are — and the more recently imported cults were very much
concerned to offer salvation, including the promise of
eternal life, to their adherents.
Twenty - five years later, a prominent Cardinal voiced similar
concern: «Belief in
eternal life has hardly any role to play in preaching today.»
Please note that as far as
eternal life is
concerned, it is not enough to just believe in God.
Greek thought of
eternal life, at its higher levels, early became individualistic; it
concerned the escape of the soul to the pure world of spirit, immaterial and invisible.
Therefore, Jesus is saying that in contrast to the Pharisees and Scribes, who care exceedingly more about the temporal
life of animals, than the
eternal well - being of humans — the Kingdom of God is
concerned far more with the
eternal well being of people as opposed to the temporal well - being of animals.
Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have
eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is
concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz
First of all, that human
life in our span of years and so far as man's history is
concerned is, like the created world itself, derivative from a realm of heavenly existence which abides
eternal over against the transient, mortal, and uncertain span of our years.
Instead of you being
concerned about the welfare of these
eternal souls as to wondering whether or not they will get the chance for salvation, you get hung up on that somehow because not everyone will get that chance in their mortal
lives that somehow that means that God is biased; that in my beliefs as to how God gives out those opprotunities that it doesn't meet to your specifications, then that automatically means that God is biased, when in my beliefs the point is that no matter how you slice it everybody whehter in this
life or afterwards will get a chance at learning about the gospel and make their own choices as to whether to follow the gospel or not.
«It is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics [of cosmology]... If [non-Christians] find a Christian mistaken in a field which they themselves know well and hear him maintaining his foolish opinions about our books, how are they going to believe those books in matters
concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of
eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven, when they think their pages are full of falsehoods on facts which they themselves have learnt from experience and the light of reason?
While her
concerned parents have given up all hope in finding their daughter alive, they just want closure so that they can go on with their
lives and finally put their daughter to her
eternal rest!
Where Thirst made a fetish of blood, Stoker (despite its own sanguinary eruptions) is primally
concerned with earth and burial — the grave, the cave - in, the beckoning hole in the ground:
eternal prisons for the
living and the dead alike.
«Donna Leon's Venetian mysteries never disappoint, calling up the romantic sights and sounds of La Serenissima even as they acquaint us with the practical matters that
concern the city's residents... The Waters of
Eternal Youth... [is] a bittersweet story that makes us appreciate Brunetti's philosophical take on the indignities, insanities, and cruelties of
life.»