Consensus or not, most of the proposed ban's pushback has come from
concerns about free speech, that holiest of cows in the Western world.
Not exact matches
His ban from visiting Britain in June 2009 has made him the «poster child» for
free speech, not only for Americans
concerned about the cultural shift towards totalitarianism and their rights to freedom of expression, but for people around the globe.
It clearly shows that in these marginal seats, the key battleground seats where the general election will be won and lost, voters are very
concerned about threats to religious liberty and
free speech.
Because of the difficulty of spotting the signs of radicalisation, there has been understandable
concern about the potential of this new duty to restrict
free speech and to potentially punish curiosity.
As a customer, you are undoubtedly
concerned about the quality of
speech writing services, which are not
free.
But he has also grown increasingly
concerned about what he sees as a severe lack of due process and
free speech at Harvard.
To be
concerned about «legal action» means that your
speech is not
free but if
speech is
free then to worry
about ridicule or ostracization is to reject personal accountability for your words and makes you a coward.
For a company dedicated to the open flow of information, expressing
concern about too much
free speech is counter-intuitive and problematic.
Americans who are
concerned about preserving
free speech would do well to tell Congress to leave the Internet alone.