They were originally written by James Madison in 1789, to address
concerns by the individual states that they would lose too much power to the federal government.
Not exact matches
Based upon this analysis, we provide our clients with recommendations
concerning whether they should: (1) move to be appointed lead plaintiff; (2) file an
individual non-class action in federal or
state court; or (3) take no active role, that is, remain a class member in an action initiated
by others.
The amendment was intended to safeguard the right of
individuals to exercise freedom of conscience in religious matters against encroachment
by the federal government, and to ensure that such
concerns would remain under the control of the several
states.
Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his
concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden
by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two
individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success
by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current
state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!
«Although the ECOWAS Commission has anchored its pursuit of the new impetus to monetary integration on «the information presented to the Heads of
State which were the basis for their recommendations», we are concerned that we have not properly articulated and analyzed a comprehensive picture of the state of preparedness of individual countries for monetary integration in ECOWAS by
State which were the basis for their recommendations», we are
concerned that we have not properly articulated and analyzed a comprehensive picture of the
state of preparedness of individual countries for monetary integration in ECOWAS by
state of preparedness of
individual countries for monetary integration in ECOWAS
by 2020.
Libertarianism (especially in the United
States) is the idea that a government should be
concerned about protecting the rights of an
individual from abuse
by other
individuals (or government) but the range of
individual agreements is set
by the two
individuals (i.e. there is a contract between two
individuals that includes a morally offensive act.
It also did not act on
concerns raised
by the
state Board of Elections about more than $ 200,000 in checks issued from campaign funds to the staff members, campaign treasurer and other
individuals, according to Maziarz.
The poor word choices, which resulted from the passion expressed
by some, diverted the attention away from the legitimate
concerns of the more than 500 hardworking mental - health workers, correctional officers, caregivers for developmentally - disabled
individuals, administrative personnel and others who attended the rally to call for substantive dialogue with the governor about the direction we need to take the Empire
State so that it serves all its citizens well, especially the most vulnerable among us.»
That lesson from No Child Left Behind, combined with the continued
concern about America's economic competitiveness, set the stage for the current Common Core Standards Initiative — an initiative
by state leaders now convinced that
individual state silos are not the way to go when it comes to setting standards.
This letter was supplemented
by policy letters to some of the
individual states implementing CEP, but
concerns arose about whether that guidance was sufficient to resolve all potential Title I issues associated with CEP implementation.
Concerns about this component: TEA's proposed rules for T - TESS include a requirement that, beginning in the 2017 - 18 school year, each teacher appraisal shall include the academic growth of the teacher's students at the
individual teacher level as measured
by one or more of four options chosen
by the local school district, including student performance on
state assessments.
Individuals can electronically file
concerns about Federal and
State data released to the public
by FMCSA via the FMCSA DataQs system (https://dataqs.fmcsa.dot.gov/login.asp).
The Commissioner shall conduct a survey and make a report to the President and the Congress, within two years of the enactment of this title,
concerning the lack of availability of equal educational opportunities for
individuals by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin in public educational institutions at all levels in the United
States, its territories and possessions, and the District of Columbia.
FMCSA does not provide any information
concerning CDL drivers stored in or retrieved
by CDLIS - Gateway to any other
individual or entity than authorized directly
by FMCSA as needing to know, or
by States via their CJIS.
Washington: Northwest Spay & Neuter Center: Tacoma (spay / neuter assistance for owned pets and feral cats)
Concern for Animals: Thurston, Mason and Lewis Counties (spay / neuter, pet food and veterinary care assistance) Forget Me Not Animal Shelter: Republic (spay / neuter assistance) Humane Society for Seattle / King County: Bellevue (low - income senior citizen's pet food assistance, discounted spay / neuter and microchipping, pet project assistance for
individuals disabled
by AIDS) Humane Society for Southwest Washington: Clark County / Vancouver (low - cost vaccinations, free & Low - cost microchipping, pet food assistance, low - cost spay / neuter, emergency boarding, low - cost euthanasia / cremation services, pet loss support groups) Olympic Mountain Pet Pals: Jefferson County (spay / neuter assistance for low - income pet owners, TNR for community cats) PAWS of Bainbridge Island: Bainbridge Island and North Kitsap (spay / neuter, vaccination, pet food, veterinary care assistance; additional services for seniors) Seattle Humane Society: Seattle (services for low - income, disabled, and senior pet owners: spay / neuter, vaccination, pet food, veterinary care assistance) Progressive Animal Welfare Society: Lynnwood (spay / neuter assistance, microchip and vaccination assistance, behavior helpline) Spokane Valley Regional Animal Protection Service: Spokane Valley (spay / neuter assistance) Washington
State University College of Veterinary Medicine Good Samaritan Fund (veterinary care assistance) Whatcom Humane Society: Bellingham (pet food, spay / neuter assistance) Whidbey Animals» Improvement Foundation (WAIF): Whidbey Island (spay / neuter assistance for owned cats and ferals, crisis care assistance, pet food banks, and temporary foster care)
The international letter has been signed
by health professionals, researchers and
concerned individuals fro around the world including Dr Robert McMurtry and Carmen Krogh of Canada, Dr Sarah Laurie of Australia, Dr Alun Evans of Scotland, and acoustician Jerry Punch of the United
States, among many others.
My more serious
concern is with the position taken
by the New York Times itself on December 6, 2009, over two weeks later after some initial questions had been cleared up, as
stated by Clarke Hoyt, the «public» editor of the New York Times, who considered the apparent hypocrisy distinguishing between «leaked government information» and «email between private
individuals»:
Principal 10
states that «each
individual shall have appropriate access to information
concerning the environment that is held
by public authorities, including information on hazardous materials and activities in their communities, and the opportunity to participate in decision - making processes.»
The court was
concerned that the UK policy set the threshold so high against the applicants from the outset «that it did not allow a balancing of the competing
individual and public interests and a proportionality test
by the secretary of
state or
by the domestic courts» because the applicants had to demonstrate as a condition precedent to the application of the policy, that the deprivation of artificial insemination facilities might prevent conception altogether.
R (on the application of T and another) v. Secretary of
State for the Home Department and another, (Supreme Court), led
by Caoilfhionn Gallagher, Conor was instructed
by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, in this case
concerning the disclosure of information pertaining to an
individual's criminal record to potential employers and others.
In concluding that it was not permissible to rely on information publicly available elsewhere, Lord Sumption
stated that he was influenced
by the deliberate drafting of section 393 FSMA with regards to fairness and the requirement for the material identifying the
individual to come from the notice itself, as well as
concern over the impact on the FCA's effectiveness if section 393 were to be interpreted differently.
«given... the principle that fundamental rights protected
by international human rights treaties should indeed belong to
individuals living in the territory of the
State party
concerned, notwithstanding its subsequent dissolution or succession... the Court considers that both the Convention and Protocol No. 1 should be deemed as having continuously been in force in respect of Montenegro as of [the date it entered into force in respect of Serbia and Montenegro through to the date of Montenegrin independence] as well as thereafter.»
--
State Bar of Arizona In related alerts, Kelly / Warner has discussed its
concerns associated with
individuals fraudulently obtaining court orders to remove information from the internet, as well as the exploitation of this
concern by the firm's detractors.
Confidences
concerning individual or domestic life entrusted
by patients to a physician and defects in the disposition or character of patients observed during medical attendance should never be revealed unless their revelation is required
by the laws of the
State.
Response: We agree with
concerns stated by commenters and eliminate these exclusions from the definition of «
individual» in the final rule.
This new provision permits covered entities to make disclosures necessary for the effective functioning of OSHA and MSHA requirements, or those of similar
state laws,
by permitting a health care provider to make disclosures without the authorization of the
individual concerning work - related injuries or illnesses or workplace medical surveillance in situations where the employer has a duty under OSHA and MSHA requirements, or under a similar
state laws, to keep records on or act on such information.
According to the report
by the Georgetown Privacy Project, among
states that do grant access to patient records, the most common basis for denying
individuals access is
concern for the life and safety of the
individual or others.
I am a bit
concerned by this: «Obliging the
state to provide and
individuals to accept services openly `.
It is not, in fact,
concerned with the position of
individuals and their rights at all and, in so far as an EU citizen resident in the UK would seek to rely on Vienna Convention, Art 70, that would have to be on the basis that denial of a right of residence in the UK (
by way of example) would be contrary to a «right, obligation or legal situation» of her home member
state (rather than herself).
The government's
stated concern was the potential for fraud or error that could result in voting
by individuals not entitled to do so; the general purpose was to improve the integrity of the electoral process.
CCLA is deeply
concerned for Canadians and Canadian residents who may be affected
by today's United
States Supreme Court decision to re-instate a modified version of President Trump's travel ban against
individuals from six predominantly Muslim countries.
You understand and agree that you shall not to use any functionality provided
by the Site to post content or initiate communications that contain: (i) Any unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, profane, hateful, racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable material of any kind, including, but not limited to, any material which encourages conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local,
state, national or international law; (ii) Advertisements or solicitations of any kind; (iii) Impersonate others or provide any kind of false information; (iv) Personal information such as messages which
state phone numbers, account numbers, addresses, or employer references.; (v) Messages
by non-spokesperson employees of Policybazaar purporting to speak on behalf of Policybazaar or containing confidential information or expressing opinions
concerning Policybazaar; (vi) Messages that offer unauthorized downloads of any copyrighted or private information; (vii) Multiple messages placed within
individual folders
by the same user restating the same point; (viii) Chain letters of any kind; or (ix) Identical (or substantially similar) messages to multiple recipients advertising any product or service, expressing a political or other similar message, or any other type of unsolicited commercial message.
I commend the approach adopted
by the South Australian Government as an approach consistent with important human rights standards, in particular, that there be effective participation
by Indigenous peoples in the development of policies that affect their rights.5 Moreover it is consistent with General Recommendation VIII of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (the CERD Committee) which
states that «group membership shall, if no justification exists to the contrary, be based upon self - identification
by the
individual concerned.»
United Nations General Recommendations on the interpretation of international instruments
state that the way in which members of a particular racial or ethnic group or groups are to be defined shall be based upon self - identification
by the
individual concerned if no justification exists to the contrary.
Such an approach has the support of the CERD Committee through General Recommendation VIII, which
states that «group membership shall, if no justification exists to the contrary, be based upon self - identification
by the
individual concerned.
The General Assembly, Guided
by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and good faith in the fulfilment of the obligations assumed
by States in accordance with the Charter, Affirming that indigenous peoples are equal to all other peoples, while recognizing the right of all peoples to be different, to consider themselves different, and to be respected as such, Affirming also that all peoples contribute to the diversity and richness of civilizations and cultures, which constitute the common heritage of humankind, Affirming further that all doctrines, policies and practices based on or advocating superiority of peoples or
individuals on the basis of national origin or racial, religious, ethnic or cultural differences are racist, scientifically false, legally invalid, morally condemnable and socially unjust, Reaffirming that indigenous peoples, in the exercise of their rights, should be free from discrimination of any kind,
Concerned that indigenous peoples have suffered from historic injustices as a result of, inter alia, their colonization and dispossession of their lands, territories and resources, thus preventing them from exercising, in particular, their right to development in accordance with their own needs and interests, Recognizing the urgent need to respect and promote the inherent rights of indigenous peoples which derive from their political, economic and social structures and from their cultures, spiritual traditions, histories and philosophies, especially their rights to their lands, territories and resources, Recognizing also the urgent need to respect and promote the rights of indigenous peoples affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements with States, Welcoming the fact that indigenous peoples are organizing themselves for political, economic, social and cultural enhancement and in order to bring to an end all forms of discrimination and oppression wherever they occur, Convinced that control by indigenous peoples over developments affecting them and their lands, territories and resources will enable them to maintain and strengthen their institutions, cultures and traditions, and to promote their development in accordance with their aspirations and needs, Recognizing that respect for indigenous knowledge, cultures and traditional practices contributes to sustainable and equitable development and proper management of the environment, Emphasizing the contribution of the demilitarization of the lands and territories of indigenous peoples to peace, economic and social progress and development, understanding and friendly relations among nations and peoples of the world, Recognizing in particular the right of indigenous families and communities to retain shared responsibility for the upbringing, training, education and well - being of their children, consistent with the rights of the child, Considering that the rights affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements between States and indigenous peoples are, in some situations, matters of international concern, interest, responsibility and character, Considering also that treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements, and the relationship they represent, are the basis for a strengthened partnership between indigenous peoples and States, Acknowledging that the Charter of the United Nations, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 2 as well as the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, (3) affirm the fundamental importance of the right to self - determination of all peoples, by virtue of which they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development, Bearing in mind that nothing in this Declaration may be used to deny any peoples their right to self - determination, exercised in conformity with international law, Convinced that the recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples in this Declaration will enhance harmonious and cooperative relations between the State and indigenous peoples, based on principles of justice, democracy, respect for human rights, non-discrimination and good faith, Encouraging States to comply with and effectively implement all their obligations as they apply to indigenous peoples under international instruments, in particular those related to human rights, in consultation and cooperation with the peoples c
Concerned that indigenous peoples have suffered from historic injustices as a result of, inter alia, their colonization and dispossession of their lands, territories and resources, thus preventing them from exercising, in particular, their right to development in accordance with their own needs and interests, Recognizing the urgent need to respect and promote the inherent rights of indigenous peoples which derive from their political, economic and social structures and from their cultures, spiritual traditions, histories and philosophies, especially their rights to their lands, territories and resources, Recognizing also the urgent need to respect and promote the rights of indigenous peoples affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements with
States, Welcoming the fact that indigenous peoples are organizing themselves for political, economic, social and cultural enhancement and in order to bring to an end all forms of discrimination and oppression wherever they occur, Convinced that control
by indigenous peoples over developments affecting them and their lands, territories and resources will enable them to maintain and strengthen their institutions, cultures and traditions, and to promote their development in accordance with their aspirations and needs, Recognizing that respect for indigenous knowledge, cultures and traditional practices contributes to sustainable and equitable development and proper management of the environment, Emphasizing the contribution of the demilitarization of the lands and territories of indigenous peoples to peace, economic and social progress and development, understanding and friendly relations among nations and peoples of the world, Recognizing in particular the right of indigenous families and communities to retain shared responsibility for the upbringing, training, education and well - being of their children, consistent with the rights of the child, Considering that the rights affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements between
States and indigenous peoples are, in some situations, matters of international
concern, interest, responsibility and character, Considering also that treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements, and the relationship they represent, are the basis for a strengthened partnership between indigenous peoples and
States, Acknowledging that the Charter of the United Nations, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 2 as well as the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, (3) affirm the fundamental importance of the right to self - determination of all peoples,
by virtue of which they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development, Bearing in mind that nothing in this Declaration may be used to deny any peoples their right to self - determination, exercised in conformity with international law, Convinced that the recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples in this Declaration will enhance harmonious and cooperative relations between the
State and indigenous peoples, based on principles of justice, democracy, respect for human rights, non-discrimination and good faith, Encouraging
States to comply with and effectively implement all their obligations as they apply to indigenous peoples under international instruments, in particular those related to human rights, in consultation and cooperation with the peoples
concernedconcerned,
By using EFT to address their
concerns,
individuals may be able to come to see their emotions as valuable sources of information instead of painful or difficult
states that are better suppressed than experienced.