I think trying to brush
these concerns under the rug is very short - sighted.
Most couples will sweep
concerns under the rug and have faith that they will work themselves out.
Although it can seem easier to sweep issues and
concerns under the rug, avoiding addressing issues can actually cause significant damage and ruptures in relationships.
Not exact matches
She also says Anderson was involved in an Asian - focused porn site even after MySpace was acquired by News Corp., a potential PR nightmare, but that Rupert Murdoch (CEO) and Peter Chernin (COO) brushed aside
concerns and swept the incident
under the
rug.
VICTORIA: New Democrat leader Carole James is asking the B.C. Liberals to address public
concerns they used $ 6 million in taxpayer dollars to secure a guilty plea to sweep the B.C. Rail corruption trial
under the
rug.
Concerned «that the whole mess might be swept
under the
rug,» Professor Snyder resigned from the commission, but not before asking Governor Grasso for a full investigation of legalized gambling in Connecticut.
As will become clear, there is actually «plenty» to sweep
under the
rug but running a red light is the least of his
concerns.
«Our
concern is that there should be a greater independence in the watchdog agency — putting watchdog in quotes — so that it is not merely a substitution of one government agency's judgment for another government agency's, and being subject to the same criticism of some of the issues being swept
under the
rug,» Mr. Silver said, echoing
concerns raised by some prominent advocates for disabled people.
Heart patients»
concerns about intimacy are «one of those things that gets swept
under the
rug too often, by not only the caregivers but also the patient and the spouse or the family,» Kopecky says.
But somehow addressing these
concerns is avoided, sweeping them
under the
rug to clear the path for a happy ending that, as a result of such evasion, registers only as unintentionally disconcerting and giving me a huge disconnect to the entire film I just watched.
However, in fairness the dangers and problems that come with the game should not just be swept
under the
rug and ignored, because there are some legitimate
concerns.
Sweeping it all
under the
rug of «internal variability» and being mainly
concerned with the effects of rising CO2 is an obstruction to the emergence of the science required to understand and predict such changes.
Because when the American public is overwhelmingly
concerned about the climate crisis and supports participating in international efforts to address it, it becomes that much harder for the current administration to just sweep the issue
under the
rug and hope that people will forget about it like with the Kyoto Protocol in 2001.
None of it matters to the LSO and our
concerns are again swept
under the
rug.
My underlying
concern is that a purist public law approach could constitute a break in the legal order, if you like a revolution imposed by intellectual persuasion, that could «pull the constitutional
rug» from
under the feet of investment treaty law.