«It was only when the IPCC was threatened with alienation from the
climate treaty process that it suddenly
concluded «a discernible
human influence on global climate,» the GWPF press release reads.
Benjamin D. Santer, a
climate scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory whose work for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was challenged by the Global Climate Coalition and allied groups, said the coalition was «engaging in a full - court press at the time, trying to cast doubt on the bottom - line conclusion of the I.P.C.C.» That panel concluded in 1995 that «the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.
climate scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory whose work for the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change was challenged by the Global Climate Coalition and allied groups, said the coalition was «engaging in a full - court press at the time, trying to cast doubt on the bottom - line conclusion of the I.P.C.C.» That panel concluded in 1995 that «the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.
Climate Change was challenged by the
Global Climate Coalition and allied groups, said the coalition was «engaging in a full - court press at the time, trying to cast doubt on the bottom - line conclusion of the I.P.C.C.» That panel concluded in 1995 that «the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.&
Global Climate Coalition and allied groups, said the coalition was «engaging in a full - court press at the time, trying to cast doubt on the bottom - line conclusion of the I.P.C.C.» That panel concluded in 1995 that «the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.
Climate Coalition and allied groups, said the coalition was «engaging in a full - court press at the time, trying to cast doubt
on the bottom - line conclusion of the I.P.C.C.» That panel
concluded in 1995 that «the balance of evidence suggests a discernible
human influence on global climate.&
global climate.
climate.»
Together, they
concluded that the nuanced language of 1995, which said «the balance of evidence suggests a discernible
human influence on global climate,» was clearly out of date.